On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly.
We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right?
It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how is it that every Taiwanese parent I meet utterly loathes it?
I speak regularly with Taiwanese who are parents or approaching the age of having children and have strong opinions about how the next generation should be raised. All of them are vocally critical of what they perceive as a monstrously antiquated, inefficient, counterproductive and borderline abusive education system, without exception. They blame it for destroying their children’s self-confidence, preventing them from becoming creative or innovative, and failing to prepare them for a changing world. They see it as blocking their growth and shaping them into cannon fodder for large corporations.
Most wish their children could be educated abroad, not for language acquisition or prestige, but because they believe that elsewhere, children are not raised as if they were preparing for an imperial civil service examination from ancient China. They are not entirely right, but there is truth in that perception.
Their opposition to Taiwan’s education system is not always visible at first, because they comply with it, but this is largely because they believe they have no choice. Once they finish venting their frustrations, they almost always add that they feel powerless to change the system and that there is no viable alternative, unless their children are to have no future.
The final note of these conversations is always the same. They end with: “I am the only one who thinks this” — even when they are the third person in a month to share exactly the same criticism with me.
What does this mean?
I have often reported on activism in Taiwan and on many grassroots movements that seek to take full advantage of the freedoms afforded by the country’s democracy. This, in itself, challenges another false cliche: That of Taiwanese being shy and meek, when they are active and upfront when needed. I have seen Taiwanese organize around causes large and small, and I have seen them succeed on many occasions.
For that reason, I believe the only thing standing between Taiwan’s education system and meaningful reform is the lack of awareness among frustrated parents that they are not alone. It is entirely possible that, at some point, the desire for reform would become widely recognized. The moment disgruntled parents realize they are far from isolated and that there are enough of them to shake the system, education in Taiwan would have to change.
That might disappoint those who prefer Taiwan to conform to their fantasies of a neat, obedient Confucian culture populated by clean-cut, robotic students, but it would be nothing short of a revolution for this country.
Julien Oeuillet is an independent reporter in Kaohsiung and hosts the weekly program Taiwan vs the World on Radio Taiwan International.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS