History is a compass for navigating geopolitical uncertainty and safeguarding political autonomy. When great powers revert to Cold War-style zero-sum thinking, trust collapses, civic space contracts and international norms fracture. The danger deepens when crisis situations are exploited to target dissent under a facade of legality. Post-2019 Hong Kong warns how national security regimes can weaponize law to suppress pluralism, dismantle democratic governance and silence civil society in the name of order.
The erosion of rights in Hong Kong carries profound lessons for Taiwan’s defense of autonomy and the future of cross-strait relations. These lessons are urgently relevant to the nation as it faces mounting military pressure, and legislative disputes over budgets and defense priorities.
Washington’s assertive posture toward smaller states, from military intervention in Venezuela to talk of direct control over Greenland, reveals a recurring dilemma of contemporary geopolitics: External guarantees might secure short-term survival, but can also erode long-term sovereignty and undermine respect for international norms.
Meanwhile, Iran’s youth-led uprisings reflect a global pattern of dissent in which digitally connected and morally driven young people confront regimes that mistake coercion for consent. From Taiwan’s Sunflower movement to protests in Hong Kong and Myanmar, we learn that democratic legitimacy cannot be commanded; it must be continuously earned.
For Taiwan, democratic resilience must be cultivated from the bottom up. Three lessons stand out:
First, democracy thrives on accountability, not fear. Empowering civic institutions is essential to sustaining democratic substance. Democracy is more than periodic elections; it depends on durable mechanisms of checks and balances. Electoral integrity, judicial independence, a free press and a vibrant civil society form the armor against constitutional decay. Where these safeguards weaken, laws cease to protect and instead become a tool of domination. Democratic leadership is grounded in trust and responsibility, not imposed through coercion or emergency rule.
Second, legal clarity and strategic alliances deter aggression more effectively than ambiguity. Deterrence should be embedded in law and multilateralism. Freedom of navigation has long anchored stability in the western Pacific, even as China and the US show tendencies toward unilateral rulemaking. Taiwan’s security and prosperity continue to rest on international norms and coordinated partnerships with like-minded regional actors. While the US’ Taiwan Relations Act might buy time and flexibility for Washington, legal clarity and multilateral commitments generate endurance and deterrence.
Third, youth engagement is foundational to good governance. Tehran’s streets remind us that legitimacy must be interactive and rooted in civic participation. Citizens ultimately measure governments by tangible results: housing affordability, job opportunities and distributive fairness. Taiwan’s experience under Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) authoritarianism offers a sobering lesson: When enforcement power centralizes and accountability blurs, institutions drift from serving the public to ensuring regime survival. Therefore, engaging with young people channels their activism into constructive efforts that strengthen democracy.
In today’s fractured global landscape, Taiwan’s strongest defense is a democracy that citizens can test, contest and reform. Resilience cannot be outsourced. Strategic prudence entails deterring threats wisely, governing transparently and listening seriously to young people whose futures are at stake.
Joseph Tse-Hei Lee is a professor of history at Pace University in New York.
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
During the long Lunar New Year’s holiday, Taiwan has shown several positive developments in different aspects of society, hinting at a hopeful outlook for the Year of the Horse, but there are also significant challenges that the country must cautiously navigate with strength, wisdom and resilience. Before the holiday break, Taiwan’s stock market closed at a record 10,080.3 points and the TAIEX wrapped up at a record-high 33,605.71 points, while Taipei and Washington formally signed the Taiwan-US Agreement on Reciprocal Trade that caps US tariffs on Taiwanese goods at 15 percent and secures Taiwan preferential tariff treatment. President William Lai (賴清德) in
RSS