On the day the British government launched a high-stakes consultation to consider fresh ways of funding the BBC in the digital era, the corporation could have done without another difficult news event of its own. US President Donald Trump’s decision to follow through on threats to sue over the content of a Panorama program broadcast in October last year might not have come as a surprise, given Trump’s litigious record in the US. However, it would add to the general air of beleaguerment at the corporation and further embolden its domestic political enemies.
A terse BBC statement on Tuesday suggested that there would be no backing down in the face of White House bullying. That is the right response to absurd claims of “overwhelming financial and reputational harm” caused to the US president, and a fantastical request for damages amounting to US$10 billion. The BBC has rightly apologized for the misleading splicing together of separate clips from Trump’s rabble-rousing speech on Jan. 6, 2021, prior to the violent storming of the US Capitol.
A serious error of judgment was made in that editing process — although the US House of Representatives Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the US Capitol concluded that Trump did use his speech to incite an insurrection. However, the claim that a program not broadcast in the US was part of a malicious plan to defame Trump and subvert the democratic process ahead of last year’s election is utterly specious.
The BBC is only the latest major media institution to be targeted by Trump in a strategic campaign of intimidation, although the first beyond US borders. There are already presidential lawsuits pending in relation to the New York Times (allegedly “a mouthpiece for the Radical Left Democratic Party”) and the Wall Street Journal, which experts said Trump has next to no chance of winning. Legal action and regulatory threats have also led to settlements in the television industry, successfully instilling a climate of fear and self-censorship.
That is the point, of course. Money is not the primary object of the exercise, although cash extracted from a case involving CBS News has reportedly been diverted toward the construction of Trump’s presidential library. The main goal is a cowed mediascape allowing the US president, and online outriders such as entrepreneur Elon Musk, to manipulate and control debate. For US corporate empires whose ambitions partly depend on the goodwill of the Trump administration, the harassment could lead to invidious choices. However, as an independent British broadcaster with its own global reputation to defend, the BBC is free to fight back.
In that battle, the corporation deserves more wholehearted backing from British Prime Minister Keir Starmer than has hitherto been the case. The BBC remains a core component of the UK’s democratic infrastructure, but Trump’s lawsuit is designed to undermine its prestige and sap its confidence, playing into the hands of his fellow travelers on the British radical right. The government should see that strategy for the attempted infringement on national sovereignty that it is.
By relentlessly targeting the US “legacy” media and now the BBC, while cosplaying the role of victim, Trump is seeking to galvanize his base and narrow the parameters of acceptable scrutiny and judgment. Auntie is not a menace to the functioning of democracy, but he is.
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
“Can you tell me where the time and motivation will come from to get students to improve their English proficiency in four years of university?” The teacher’s question — not accusatory, just slightly exasperated — was directed at the panelists at the end of a recent conference on English language learning at Taiwanese universities. Perhaps thankfully for the professors on stage, her question was too big for the five minutes remaining. However, it hung over the venue like an ominous cloud on an otherwise sunny-skies day of research into English as a medium of instruction and the government’s Bilingual Nation 2030
RSS