News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events.
The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years.
Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials are no longer trying to hide behind vague language.
Former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and President William Lai (賴清德), alongside senior officials from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of National Defense, have publicly referred to Israel as a possible model for Taiwan. This includes references to military preparedness, civil resilience, emergency response and technological innovation. It seems that such openness signals intent rather than just rhetoric.
Historically, this development should not come as a shock. Taiwan and Israel have a long record of security cooperation dating back to the 1960s, when Israel assisted Taiwan’s nuclear ambitions, and extending through the 1970s and 1980s with arms sales, tech transfers and operational know-how.
What is surprising is not the revival itself, but the long dormancy that followed. For decades, bilateral ties were largely confined to trade, technology and academic exchanges.
That raises an obvious question: What changed?
Three factors stand out.
First, cross-strait relations have deteriorated steadily since the Democratic Progressive Party returned to power in 2016. Under Tsai, and even more clearly under Lai, Beijing has abandoned any pretense of accommodation. Military pressure, “gray zone” activities and explicit timelines about readiness for conflict have become central to China’s signaling strategy. In response, Taiwan has intensified its search for partners that can offer practical security experience rather than symbolic political support. Israel fits that requirement.
Second, and closely related, Israel’s military experience matters. Even before the current crisis in the Middle East, the Israel Defense Forces could be regarded as among the most operationally experienced militaries in the world. Continuous exposure to high-intensity conflict, missile threats and civilian emergency management has produced a body of experience that few armed forces possess.
From Taiwan’s perspective, Israel’s missile defense architecture, civil defense systems, and integrated approach to military and civilian resilience are especially relevant. This is not about copying Israel wholesale, but about extracting usable lessons under conditions of sustained security pressure.
The third factor is political and perhaps the most overlooked. Taiwan-Israel security cooperation stalled largely because Israel was unwilling to jeopardize its expanding relationship with China. To some extent, that calculation no longer holds. The deterioration in China-Israel relations began during the administration of US President Donald Trump, particularly over infrastructure and technology projects. It accelerated following Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack and China’s response, which was viewed in Jerusalem as morally evasive and strategically revealing.
China is increasingly seen within Israel’s political and security establishment not as a neutral economic partner, but as a strategic problem — not a traditional threat such as Iran, but a serious security concern nonetheless.
As a result, Israel is far less restrained when it comes to engagement with Taiwan. Beijing’s displeasure is no longer sufficient to block cooperation outright. This does not mean Israel has abandoned caution, but it does mean the old red lines have shifted.
Taken together, these developments point to a recalibration rather than a dramatic realignment. A full transformation of Taiwan-Israel relations is unlikely, and there are clear limits imposed by geopolitics, US interests and Israel’s own strategic priorities. Nevertheless, the shift is real. For Taiwan, this represents a rare window of opportunity to deepen cooperation with a partner whose security experience is relevant and hard-earned. The question is not whether Taiwan should explore this path, but how strategically and selectively it chooses to do so.
Mor Sobol is an associate professor in Tamkang University’s Department of Diplomacy and International Relations.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
RSS