After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week.
The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review.
The opposition’s unprecedented obstruction has triggered domestic and international concerns over Taiwan’s security.
The letter by the 37 US lawmakers — addressed to senior Taiwanese politicians, including Han, and all the heads and caucus whips of the opposition and ruling parties — stated that the threat posed by China against Taiwan has never been greater, and while the US must address the massive backlog in weapons deliveries, Taipei also needs to step up its military readiness.
“Without significant increases in Taiwan’s defense spending at levels reflected in President Lai’s proposed special budget, this progress will be insufficient,” the letter said.
After more than three months of the opposition blocking the budget review, Han and Deputy Legislative Speaker Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) finally stepped up to the plate, urging the legislative caucuses to reach a consensus to send the Executive Yuan’s proposed bill for committee review and list it on the plenary agenda.
At a KMT legislative seminar on the same day, Han recounted how Qing Dynasty eunuchs would suffocate a person to death by putting a piece of wet paper over the person’s nose and mouth. Han said that “if the special arms procurement bill could be referred to committee review, it would be like removing the wet paper over the nose and mouth [of the KMT],” implying that the party had misjudged the public reaction and been besieged on all sides for blocking the budget’s review.
With like-minded countries taking more responsibility for their own defense by bolstering defense spending, the opposition parties’ blocking of Taiwan’s defense bills has caused international allies, especially the US, to doubt their willingness to defend the nation.
As a recent survey by Taiwan Public Opinion Foundation showed, the majority of Taiwanese see the KMT as a party identifying with China more than with Taiwan and unworthy of public trust. Its consistent obstruction of defense budgets could further “suffocate” the public’s trust in it.
Although the opposition finally gave a little ground, the Executive Yuan’s special defense bill would be reviewed alongside the TPP’s NT$400 billion version. The KMT also announced that it would submit its own proposal to be reviewed together with the other two versions.
However, the two opposition parties’ proposals appear to be impromptu efforts focused more on budget cuts than real defense needs.
The TPP’s version slashed the budget by eliminating several crucial weapon systems, and the reductions have been widely criticized as lacking in defense expertise and impractical.
It excluded the C5ISR command and control system, and ruled out equipment items such as ammunition depots, shelters and personnel training. The Ministry of National Defense has warned that their eliminations would create difficulties for the command, operation, storage and maintenance of valuable weapon systems.
TPP also removed the section of “non-red supply chain” from weapon procurement, going against the budget’s goal to support the domestic defense industry and achieve self-sufficiency.
The KMT’s version is yet to be finalized, as the party is divided on the bill’s content. While some younger KMT legislators have suggested that the proposed budget would be more than NT$810 billion, KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) has said that major bills should be decided by party headquarters, which reportedly aims to cap the budget at NT$350 billion.
Given Cheng’s team’s intensifying interactions with the Chinese Communist Party and Cheng’s planned meeting with the Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), there are growing concerns that the KMT would pander to Xi’s objections against US arms sales to Taiwan, in exchange for a Xi-Cheng meeting.
National defense must be pragmatic, and budgets must be based on professional assessments. The legislators’ upcoming deliberation on the special defense budget should focus on practical defense needs, not just on bargaining. Otherwise, it would be like putting another “wet paper” hindering Taiwan’s stability and security.
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
During the long Lunar New Year’s holiday, Taiwan has shown several positive developments in different aspects of society, hinting at a hopeful outlook for the Year of the Horse, but there are also significant challenges that the country must cautiously navigate with strength, wisdom and resilience. Before the holiday break, Taiwan’s stock market closed at a record 10,080.3 points and the TAIEX wrapped up at a record-high 33,605.71 points, while Taipei and Washington formally signed the Taiwan-US Agreement on Reciprocal Trade that caps US tariffs on Taiwanese goods at 15 percent and secures Taiwan preferential tariff treatment. President William Lai (賴清德) in