“Can you tell me where the time and motivation will come from to get students to improve their English proficiency in four years of university?”
The teacher’s question — not accusatory, just slightly exasperated — was directed at the panelists at the end of a recent conference on English language learning at Taiwanese universities. Perhaps thankfully for the professors on stage, her question was too big for the five minutes remaining.
However, it hung over the venue like an ominous cloud on an otherwise sunny-skies day of research into English as a medium of instruction and the government’s Bilingual Nation 2030 policy.
The dark cloud also pre-empted my own: What does language learning and testing really mean in an age of on-demand artificial intelligence (AI)?
I ask this question not because I have the answer (nobody does), but because applying old fixes to a new reality is dangerous. We must understand the problems AI presents before we can begin to engineer a solution.
AI can now read, write and translate faster and better than any human. With the rise of wearables and voice-mode assistants on every phone, real-time translation of all four language skills is no longer science fiction.
This means that an 85-year-old Taiwanese great-grandmother, who has never formally studied English, could use ChatGPT’s voice mode on her phone to have a better conversation with a foreigner than a university student who has “studied” English for more than 1,000 hours since elementary school.
For every Taiwanese student who reaches an intermediate stage of proficiency, there are likely 10 who never make it past the elementary level. This is not just inefficient learning, it is a form of childhood theft. My own bilingual daughter had to sit through hundreds of hours of English classes full of Chinese explanations she could not understand, wasting time that could have been spent on actual development.
Yet, the conference felt stuck in a pre-ChatGPT past, just like the bilingual nation policy it strives to align with. Are we thinking enough about the unknown waters we are entering? It feels like sailors charging full steam ahead in a tropical vessel for an arctic expedition, with no thought to the retrofitting needed for the hidden icebergs and freezing temperatures that AI would bring.
These cooling temperatures are creating clouds of important questions that resist clear answers.
First, what is language learning for in the age of AI? At the very least, we should encourage teachers and students to use AI to learn. With thoughtful prompting, AI is a tireless tutor that could create level-specific lessons for reading, evaluate writing and read texts aloud. Tools like ChatGPT and Gemini now offer impressive voice modes that interact with learners in real time, even code-switching between languages; this covers listening and speaking practice.
Second, what does language proficiency mean now? Traditional proficiency scales require thousands of hours to climb. However, in today’s AI-saturated world, everyone is already “functionally bilingual.”
What tips the ability scales now is not raw vocabulary size, but the ability to evaluate the appropriateness of AI output. That is why, in my classes for professionals, I focus on communicative strategies to guide these tools rather than rote learning. My students do not have the time — or motivation — to raise their proficiency the old-fashioned way. Here, AI is a career skill, an amplifier of human ability. Yes, this is AI dependence, but it is a “controlled dependence.”
Reading and writing are the easiest skills to “functionally” master with AI. A text can be summarized instantly; writing is generated flawlessly at a whim. That leaves listening and speaking. These are the first skills we learn as toddlers and remain the most important for authentic connection.
For certain situations, unmediated human interaction is crucial for developing trust with clients, collaborators and superiors.
We might be returning to the prestige of oral communication that defined cultures before the printing press.
The third question is: Who still needs AI-free human proficiency?
If speaking skills become the new gold standard, who really needs to spend years mastering them? The answer is specific: Service providers and professionals whose job is to persuade, relate and build relationships, such as nurses, salespeople and teachers.
This begs a further question about the education system: Does everyone need to be put into the same factory assembly line of English classes from elementary school to college?
Finally, what should language testing measure?
If AI collapses traditional constructs, perhaps language testing should split into two domains: Human proficiency (what you can do face-to-face) and AI-mediated proficiency (what you can do with the tools you actually use).
Most industries already assume AI-mediated communication for reading and writing. How many roles in Taiwan really require unfiltered human interaction? Some, but not many. Maybe testing should reflect that divergence and provide two scores: one for AI-free human proficiency and another for AI-mediated ability.
If we acknowledge these two kinds of proficiency, the teacher’s question from the conference returns in a new light: Where indeed would the time and motivation come from to raise human proficiency when it is no longer needed — nor wanted — by most people?
Nigel P. Daly is a writer, trainer, and researcher on AI and language education. He has a doctorate in English from National Taiwan Normal University.
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
RSS