In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing.
TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.”
The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education also not be able to take a determined and principled stance on the long-overlooked institutional challenges that local language teachers face?
Every day across Taiwan, local language teachers are traveling between schools to classes, promoting culture and mother tongue development. However, most of them are only formally employed in the capacity of substitute teachers or as teaching support. They prepare classes, teach and participate in administrative affairs just as full-time, single-school teachers do, but huge gaps persist in terms of pay, benefits and training opportunities. To borrow the business vernacular, they are the outsourced employees of the education system. Educational spaces and professionals who have chosen to support local language policy development have long been marginalized by the system — an injustice that is surely deserving of being set right.
Article 10 of the Development of National Languages Act (國家語言發展法) stipulates that “the central supervisory agency for education shall train instructors in national languages, and assist the supervisory agencies of special municipalities, counties, and cities in the hiring, in principle, of dedicated instructors” — where the term “dedicated” refers to in-house and often full-time employees. Clearly, it is the government’s responsibility to establish a system through which local language teachers can be offered formal employment and stability through which they can continue to teach and develop professionally.
Despite this, the system for teaching support staff operates through year-by-year appointments and pays by the hour. These teachers lack benefits that increase with seniority such as bonuses and annual leave, as well as job security and opportunities for upward mobility. Their working conditions go against the spirit of the act. If these teachers continue to be taken for granted, there can be no stable foundation from which local language education could flourish.
It has been six years since the act was promulgated. The government has repeatedly made noises about wanting to “protect language rights” and “cultivate language talent,” but local language teachers continue to be left out in the cold. The gradual normalization of using the teaching support framework for local language teachers, initially intended as a transitional structure, has undermined their professional dignity and trapped the system in a vicious cycle of underappreciation and insecurity.
These language teachers are not calling for an immediate transition to full-time positions, but simply the ability to do their work in clearly defined roles within a reasonable framework. The ministry could, in line with the act, establish such a system with standardized qualification requirements, training and hiring processes. It would give local and native language education in Taiwan a stable foundation, and give teachers the deserved level of respect.
Offering education in students’ native languages is more than a language policy — it is a manifestation of cultural respect. For children to be able to naturally converse in Hakka, Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese) or indigenous languages in class, what they are practicing is not just a language, but identification with their land and culture. The driving force of this practice is, of course, those educators who quietly travel from school to school as local language teachers.
If TSMC has the resolve to address its own institutional failures, so too can the ministry. Reforms must begin with respect for local language teachers, just as linguistic equality begins with addressing systemic injustices.
Huang Li-fen is a support teacher of the Hakka language.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS