US President Donald Trump’s airstrikes on boats off the Venezuelan coast have dominated news headlines since September, with the president recently declaring the country’s airspace “closed.” Venezuelans are desperately guessing about their future and wondering whether Trump would make good on his promises to evict their strongman ruler, Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, from power. Who would take over, and on what constitutional grounds?
On Nov. 18, the Washington Post jumped headlong into this debate by giving the Venezuelan opposition leader and this year’s Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Maria Corina Machado, a platform to present her new “Freedom Manifesto.”
The accompanying editorial cast Machado as Venezuela’s latter-day cross between former US presidents Thomas Jefferson and James Madison: “America’s founding document,” the paper’s editorial board contends, “clearly inspired” this “precursor to a new Constitution.”
Machado has spent the past year in hiding, evading an arrest warrant issued by Maduro’s regime after its brazen falsification of the July 2024 presidential election results, while the real winner, Edmundo Gonzalez Urrutia, fled into exile.
However, this autumn, Trump and the Norwegian Nobel Committee have unwittingly teamed up to elevate Machado’s profile. By cunningly dedicating her Nobel Prize to the obscenely vain Trump, Machado has deepened US support for the Venezuelan opposition’s cause. She now patiently awaits the outcome of Trump’s campaign to force Maduro out.
FALSE PORTRAYAL
However, the Washington Post’s attempt to drape Machado in the stars and stripes misses what the Venezuelan opposition is about. Associating her with the upcoming 250th anniversary of the US’ Declaration of Independence might well be an effective way to drum up US public support, but it elides Machado’s defining quality: She is a practicing Catholic whose faith shapes her political and economic views alike.
Neither “extremist neoliberal” nor “the smiling face of Washington’s regime-change machine,” Machado is the scion of a long line of Christian democrats in Latin America.
She might see an advantage in depicting Maduro’s overthrow as an “America first” cause, but her own “Freedom Manifesto” gives the lie to this conceit. In it, she hitches herself not to Jefferson or Madison, but to the founding father of Catholic thought, Thomas Aquinas.
The first core value she lists is not liberty but “Dignity: Our Guiding Principle.” For Christian democrats, “dignity” is shorthand for the image of God that can be found in each human being — understood as a person, not as some marginal unit of economic production. The Catholic concept of dignity passed from Aquinas’ own medieval Dominicans to the early Jesuits, and finally to the 19th-century “Thomist” renaissance launched by Pope Leo XIII (the current pope’s namesake), whose pathbreaking encyclical, Rerum Novarum (“Rights and Duties of Capital and Labor”), reconciled the Catholic Church to modernity.
DIGNITY
It was this tradition that lay behind the French philosopher Jacques Maritain’s concept of “human rights” in the 1940s, and nowhere was Maritain read more widely than in Spanish-language America. Among his most famous disciples was Rafael Caldera, a future president of Venezuela (1969 to 1974, and 1994 to 1999) and the founder of a Latin American political movement that served as a bridge for European and US-based anti-communists.
This was Cold War soft power at its most effective. For decades, Venezuela’s capital, Caracas, was known as the “Paris of South America” — long before Buenos Aires promoted itself as such. It held this status until oil prices tumbled in the 1980s, crashing the Venezuelan economy and endowing former Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez’s rebel forces with popular legitimacy. Chavez’s death then brought Maduro’s succession and his dystopian regime.
In a pivotal clause of her manifesto, Machado’s Spanish word persona has been rendered in English as “individual,” but this is a mistranslation. The correct wording should be, “Let dignity serve as the driving force ... that fosters the complete development of each person.”
In Catholic political and social thought, a “person” is a dignity-endowed human being made in God’s image, while an “individual” is shorn of ties to community or nation.
This is not pedantic wordplay, but a fundamental philosophical difference. Machado might be proposing to privatize US$1.7 trillion in state-held Venezuelan assets, but her talk of property rights is a nod to Aquinas and Maritain, not to Friedrich von Hayek or Milton Friedman, let alone to Trump.
Machado’s manifesto uses precisely the same strategy that turned post-Nazi West Germany into a self-styled social market economy which married the market with locally rooted corporatism. Many of Germany’s post-World War II leaders called themselves “Christian democrats,” and the man in charge in Berlin today, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, leads a party called the Christian Democratic Union.
OPPORTUNITY
Given such deep political and philosophical commitments, Machado’s pandering to Trump should not remotely be seen as defining her.
In the 1960s, West Germany pumped enormous sums into Latin America in hopes of training a generation of anti-communist Catholic politicians who would oppose Soviet interests without surrendering to US foreign policy. Caldera’s tenure as a Christian democratic president almost fulfilled this dream in the 1970s, only to be reversed by his khaki-clad populist successor, Chavez.
Nonetheless, with oil prices declining again this year, the rosary-wearing Machado — if ultimately installed in power — could succeed where Caldera failed.
Her ascendency is a clear sign that Catholicism is regaining salience after decades of suppression by Chavez and Maduro. In October, Pope Leo XIV announced the canonization of the first-ever Venezuelan saints, sparking a national celebration for which Maduro cynically tried to take credit.
Across the US political spectrum, too few people understand how important Catholic thought has been in shaping the Latin American right. If she succeeds, the woman looking to reclaim the idea of a “people’s party” from the Venezuelan left might find closer ideological allies not in Washington, but in Berlin, Paris, Warsaw and Rome. Perhaps Pope Leo XIV already sees in her movement what Pope John Paul II saw in the Solidarity protests that brought down communist rule in Poland: a true revolution of personal dignity.
Piotr H. Kosicki is associate professor of history at the University of Maryland.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other