The Economist recently published stories on Taiwan titled “The hidden risks in Taiwan’s boom” and “Taiwan’s amazing economic achievements are yielding alarming strains,” which said the New Taiwan dollar has long been undervalued.
According to the magazine, to avoid “Dutch disease” — where a single product or sector drives currency appreciation, squeezing other sectors — Taiwan has suppressed the value of its currency, which has driven purchasing power down, house prices up and accumulated financial risk in what it called the “Formosan flu.”
Dutch disease is driven by a boom in a pure-export industry typified by natural resources, for which Taiwan’s semiconductor and artificial intelligence industries have never fit the bill. In fact, the semiconductor industry functions as a highly import-reliant supply chain.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) depends on significant quantities of equipment and materials from the Netherlands, Japan and the US for its chips. Its growth does not directly drive up exchange rates nor create a one-way appreciation pressure the same way that natural gas exports do — like what happened in 1959 after the discovery of the Groningen gas field, which led to the coining of the term “Dutch disease.”
According to basic economic theory, Taiwan’s export strength and trade surplus should raise the value of the NT dollar, not lead to its chronic undervaluation. However, in practice the NT dollar’s fluctuations bear little relation to export performance, but are instead closely tied to the flows of foreign capital. Foreign investors hold more than US$720 billion of TSMC stocks, higher than Taiwan’s total foreign exchange reserves of US$600 billion. When the stock market is hot and foreign capital is flowing in, the NT dollar’s value rises; when tech stocks weaken or geopolitical tensions rise, foreign investors withdraw and the NT dollar suffers. These exchange rate mechanisms are not symptoms of Dutch disease, but are typical of capital markets highly dependent on foreign investment.
Chalking all of Taiwan’s economic woes up to exchange rates is too one-sided. Although exchange rates do impact the cost of living and could accentuate economic issues, they are more of a mirror than cause, reflecting the nature of an economy.
Taiwan’s real issue is with industrial imbalances and widening income inequality. Over the past 10 years, the tech industry’s success has pulled its wages far ahead of other industries. Meanwhile, the service sector and low-productivity domestic industries have struggled to keep up, and rising house prices have widened the generational wealth gap. The increase in house prices is driven not by exchange rates, but by wages failing to keep up with asset returns. Excessive industrial concentration is a result of overdependence on a few highly profitable sectors.
In this economic landscape, exchange rates reveal only the underlying problems. If we ignore what is going on beneath the surface, our understanding will always be distorted. What Taiwan needs is not intervention in exchange rates, but determination to address structural issues through industrial upgrading, investment in education, smarter resource allocation and regional development.
The Economist’s warning is useful, but Taiwan’s case is not an example of Dutch disease. What we are facing is the volatility of global markets and the structural risks of overconcentration in one sector. If we can maintain clarity in diagnosing the problem, policy can move in a pragmatic direction and avoid skating around our central economic challenges.
Dino Wei works in the information technology industry.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
RSS