On Wednesday, China abruptly suspended imports of Japanese seafood, citing the need for further monitoring of water conditions, and halting imports of Hokkaido scallops, which had just embarked on their first trip to China. However, the move is not really due to a technical issue — it is another blatant act of political retaliation. China’s weaponization of the economy is nothing new, and what Japan faces is all too familiar to Taiwan.
In 2021, China, with the intention of creating internal turmoil in Taiwan and making farmers blame the government for damages, suspended Taiwanese pineapple imports right at the peak of harvest season. However, Beijing never anticipated that Taiwan’s true friend — Japan — would step up at such a crucial moment.
On March 11 that year — which coincided with the tenth anniversary of the 2011’s massive, deadly earthquake — Japanese who had long remembered Taiwan’s support during the disaster stepped forward to return the favor. Within just a few days, Japanese orders for Taiwanese pineapples surged to three times the total of the previous year.
Even during the off-season and cold weather, Japanese consumers still grabbed up box after box of pineapples. By contrast, pineapples from the Philippines — which were half the cost — received little attention. Japan did more than provide verbal support — it used genuine sentiment and concrete action to tell Taiwan: “You are not alone.”
The situation Japan faces is almost identical to what Taiwan dealt with back then. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s statement that a Chinese naval blockade of Taiwan would constitute a “survival-threatening situation” merely reflects geopolitical reality, yet China continues to retaliate. Now, it is attempting to use seafood as a tool for exerting political pressure.
US Ambassador to Japan George Glass immediately voiced public support, sharing a social media post calling China’s previous ban on Japanese seafood “unjustified” and describing Hokkaido scallops as “the perfect start to any meal.” He criticized the ban as economic coercion — a “hard habit to break” for Beijing.
“But just as the US stood by Japan during China’s last unwarranted ban on Japanese seafood, we will be there for our ally again this time,” he said.
The US’ swift response demonstrates the unshakable strength of the US-Japan alliance, once again exposing the Chinese Communist Party’s “wolf warrior” tactics to the world.
Taiwan and Japan are not just neighboring countries, but a community with a shared destiny.
Former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe’s famous remark that “a Taiwan contingency is a Japan contingency” reflects an undeniable geopolitical truth.
By simply reiterating this fact, Takaichi has incurred China’s sweeping retaliation through the tourism, entertainment and trade sanctions — the very tactics typically used on Taiwan, directed at Japan.
True friendship is revealed in times of adversity. When Taiwan needed help the most, Japan stepped up without hesitation to help pineapple farmers overcome their worries.
Now that Japanese fishermen are under the same pressure and Takaichi has even received death threats for supporting Taiwan, how could Taiwanese — who have always valued reciprocity — turn a blind eye?
A Japan contingency is a Taiwan contingency. If we do not stand with Japan’s scallops now, when would we?
Wang Hui-sheng is a founding member of the East Asian Research Institute.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS