Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine.
Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous.
Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so tenaciously to it when challenged by the interviewer.
Cheng also contended, speaking about Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambitions to annex Taiwan — which he consistently claims without factual support, as belonging to China — that “Beijing does not want to turn Taiwan into the next Hong Kong,” a reference to a previously open society now caught in a repressive nightmare.
Based on her statements, Cheng might also argue that Xi is a democratically elected leader. Condoning dictators is her way of reassuring Taiwanese that they would be safe in Xi’s hands.
The rationale behind her assertions is Cheng’s wish to distance Taiwan from democracies such as the US, Japan and EU states, and to leave Taiwan to Xi’s mercy.
Freedom of expression is a constitutionally guaranteed right in democratic Taiwan, but comments need to be evaluated within their context. Cheng’s position as leader of the main opposition party, and one which effectively commands a legislative majority, means that her right to say whatever she likes comes with more responsibility than it does with ordinary citizens.
While acknowledging her right to say these things, Taiwanese must also be mindful of the implications of her doing so, and her words and actions going forward.
When Cheng asserts that Putin is not a dictator and hints that Xi is not either, this should not be mistaken for naivety: It is a willful distortion of the obvious preluding more distortions.
Her predecessor, former KMT chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), sought to brand President William Lai (賴清德) as a dictator during this year’s recall campaigns. Breathtaking irony aside, neither Cheng’s nor Chu’s comments should be regarded as expressions of what they actually think: They were paving the way for forging coherent narratives out of absurdities, as a political trick.
Taiwan has wasted too much time dealing with the delusional idea that the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan in any way represents China. The ROC is the name of a once-defeated regime that must now look to the future.
When US President Donald Trump said “Taiwan is Taiwan,” he cut through years of sophistry. All political parties in Taiwan should have embraced this simple truth years ago to bring the nation into the modern age.
Cheng’s contention that Putin is not a dictator is simply another absurdity layered on past absurdities, all spoken by politicians attempting to cloak their agendas.
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
RSS