Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine.
Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous.
Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so tenaciously to it when challenged by the interviewer.
Cheng also contended, speaking about Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambitions to annex Taiwan — which he consistently claims without factual support, as belonging to China — that “Beijing does not want to turn Taiwan into the next Hong Kong,” a reference to a previously open society now caught in a repressive nightmare.
Based on her statements, Cheng might also argue that Xi is a democratically elected leader. Condoning dictators is her way of reassuring Taiwanese that they would be safe in Xi’s hands.
The rationale behind her assertions is Cheng’s wish to distance Taiwan from democracies such as the US, Japan and EU states, and to leave Taiwan to Xi’s mercy.
Freedom of expression is a constitutionally guaranteed right in democratic Taiwan, but comments need to be evaluated within their context. Cheng’s position as leader of the main opposition party, and one which effectively commands a legislative majority, means that her right to say whatever she likes comes with more responsibility than it does with ordinary citizens.
While acknowledging her right to say these things, Taiwanese must also be mindful of the implications of her doing so, and her words and actions going forward.
When Cheng asserts that Putin is not a dictator and hints that Xi is not either, this should not be mistaken for naivety: It is a willful distortion of the obvious preluding more distortions.
Her predecessor, former KMT chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), sought to brand President William Lai (賴清德) as a dictator during this year’s recall campaigns. Breathtaking irony aside, neither Cheng’s nor Chu’s comments should be regarded as expressions of what they actually think: They were paving the way for forging coherent narratives out of absurdities, as a political trick.
Taiwan has wasted too much time dealing with the delusional idea that the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan in any way represents China. The ROC is the name of a once-defeated regime that must now look to the future.
When US President Donald Trump said “Taiwan is Taiwan,” he cut through years of sophistry. All political parties in Taiwan should have embraced this simple truth years ago to bring the nation into the modern age.
Cheng’s contention that Putin is not a dictator is simply another absurdity layered on past absurdities, all spoken by politicians attempting to cloak their agendas.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS