China’s cognitive warfare efforts targeting Taiwan have sought to exploit economic anxieties and fears of war, the Taipei-based Information Operations Research Group said in a report released on Tuesday.
The campaigns have centered on constructing a narrative of “Taiwan defeatism” — the idea that resistance to Beijing’s ambitions is futile and that unification with China is inevitable, group codirector Yu Chih-hao (游知澔) told a news conference.
People who identify as both Taiwanese and Chinese are particularly vulnerable, as they often hold positive views of China’s economy while viewing the Democratic Progressive Party negatively, Yu said. Likewise, TikTok users are more likely to express approval of China and pessimism about Taiwan’s economy, reflecting the role of social media in amplifying Beijing’s messaging, he said.
The executive branch should bolster information governance, regulate the quality of open-source media and emphasize critical reading skills. The public should cultivate the habit of verifying information before engaging in public discussion, he said.
The challenge in addressing cognitive warfare is that democratic governments must balance freedom of speech and access to information with the need to guard against destabilizing disinformation. A democracy thrives on open exchange, yet openness can be exploited to erode confidence in its institutions.
Moreover, media literacy is not evenly distributed. Older generations tend to cling to established views, while young people often consume and share content without assessing its accuracy. Adding to the difficulty, not all harmful content is factually false. Increasingly, malicious actors deploy artificial intelligence to craft emotionally manipulative material that skirts outright falsehoods. For example, videos showcasing China’s Xinjiang area mask the grim realities of mass surveillance, internment camps and forced labor. The content seduces the senses while obscuring human rights abuses.
Media literacy initiatives must adapt to the evolving battlefield. Schools should integrate digital literacy into curricula from an early age, training students to recognize manipulative content even when it appears to be accurate.
China often seeks to appeal to Taiwanese by invoking a shared cultural heritage, a message that resonates in households with deep ties to the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
The government should emphasize that while cultural similarities exist, the Taiwan Strait is divided by irreconcilable political systems. Taiwan upholds individual freedoms and personal expression; China does not.
Evidence of Beijing’s authoritarianism is not abstract. The Mainland Affairs Council last week reported that about nine Taiwanese go “missing” in China each month, either detained and interrogated or otherwise deprived of freedom of movement.
The world has also witnessed China’s ruthless suppression of Hong Kong’s democracy movement in 2019, when protesters disappeared into prisons or fled into exile. Beijing’s “one country, two systems” promise collapsed the moment it threatened the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) monopoly on power.
This is the reality that Taiwan must recognize: The CCP cannot tolerate any challenges to its authority, not even symbolic ones. The government must impress upon young people that while China has beauty, vibrancy and heritage, it also harbors injustices incompatible with Taiwan’s democratic values.
Taiwan’s freedoms — of speech, movement and thought — are fragile treasures worth defending. Military strength and international alliances matter, but the most powerful defense is clarity about what is at stake.
Taiwan must resist cognitive warfare with fact-checks and counter-propaganda, as well as confidence in the value of its democratic way of life.
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Taiwan Retrocession Day is observed on Oct. 25 every year. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government removed it from the list of annual holidays immediately following the first successful transition of power in 2000, but the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-led opposition reinstated it this year. For ideological reasons, it has been something of a political football in the democratic era. This year, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) designated yesterday as “Commemoration Day of Taiwan’s Restoration,” turning the event into a conceptual staging post for its “restoration” to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The Mainland Affairs Council on Friday criticized
A Reuters report published this week highlighted the struggles of migrant mothers in Taiwan through the story of Marian Duhapa, a Filipina forced to leave her infant behind to work in Taiwan and support her family. After becoming pregnant in Taiwan last year, Duhapa lost her job and lived in a shelter before giving birth and taking her daughter back to the Philippines. She then returned to Taiwan for a second time on her own to find work. Duhapa’s sacrifice is one of countless examples among the hundreds of thousands of migrant workers who sustain many of Taiwan’s households and factories,
RSS