China’s cognitive warfare efforts targeting Taiwan have sought to exploit economic anxieties and fears of war, the Taipei-based Information Operations Research Group said in a report released on Tuesday.
The campaigns have centered on constructing a narrative of “Taiwan defeatism” — the idea that resistance to Beijing’s ambitions is futile and that unification with China is inevitable, group codirector Yu Chih-hao (游知澔) told a news conference.
People who identify as both Taiwanese and Chinese are particularly vulnerable, as they often hold positive views of China’s economy while viewing the Democratic Progressive Party negatively, Yu said. Likewise, TikTok users are more likely to express approval of China and pessimism about Taiwan’s economy, reflecting the role of social media in amplifying Beijing’s messaging, he said.
The executive branch should bolster information governance, regulate the quality of open-source media and emphasize critical reading skills. The public should cultivate the habit of verifying information before engaging in public discussion, he said.
The challenge in addressing cognitive warfare is that democratic governments must balance freedom of speech and access to information with the need to guard against destabilizing disinformation. A democracy thrives on open exchange, yet openness can be exploited to erode confidence in its institutions.
Moreover, media literacy is not evenly distributed. Older generations tend to cling to established views, while young people often consume and share content without assessing its accuracy. Adding to the difficulty, not all harmful content is factually false. Increasingly, malicious actors deploy artificial intelligence to craft emotionally manipulative material that skirts outright falsehoods. For example, videos showcasing China’s Xinjiang area mask the grim realities of mass surveillance, internment camps and forced labor. The content seduces the senses while obscuring human rights abuses.
Media literacy initiatives must adapt to the evolving battlefield. Schools should integrate digital literacy into curricula from an early age, training students to recognize manipulative content even when it appears to be accurate.
China often seeks to appeal to Taiwanese by invoking a shared cultural heritage, a message that resonates in households with deep ties to the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
The government should emphasize that while cultural similarities exist, the Taiwan Strait is divided by irreconcilable political systems. Taiwan upholds individual freedoms and personal expression; China does not.
Evidence of Beijing’s authoritarianism is not abstract. The Mainland Affairs Council last week reported that about nine Taiwanese go “missing” in China each month, either detained and interrogated or otherwise deprived of freedom of movement.
The world has also witnessed China’s ruthless suppression of Hong Kong’s democracy movement in 2019, when protesters disappeared into prisons or fled into exile. Beijing’s “one country, two systems” promise collapsed the moment it threatened the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) monopoly on power.
This is the reality that Taiwan must recognize: The CCP cannot tolerate any challenges to its authority, not even symbolic ones. The government must impress upon young people that while China has beauty, vibrancy and heritage, it also harbors injustices incompatible with Taiwan’s democratic values.
Taiwan’s freedoms — of speech, movement and thought — are fragile treasures worth defending. Military strength and international alliances matter, but the most powerful defense is clarity about what is at stake.
Taiwan must resist cognitive warfare with fact-checks and counter-propaganda, as well as confidence in the value of its democratic way of life.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS