Taiwan and France should cooperate on tackling disinformation and defending democratic values, French Senator Rachid Temal said during a meeting in Taipei on Tuesday.
Temal, chairman of the French Senate’s Taiwan Friendship Group, arrived in Taiwan on Sunday last week for a six-day trip, leading a delegation of French senators. He expressed hope that Taiwan and France would deepen cooperation not only in trade, but also in areas such as information security and ministerial exchanges to share practical experience in countering disinformation.
Disinformation from Russia has become an increasing concern in France, particularly over the past year. French authorities said they have found evidence of disinformation originating from Russia to sow discord online, much of it generated by artificial intelligence (AI).
“Those who spread disinformation aim to confuse us so much that we can no longer distinguish between truth and falsehood, and lose trust in our democracy and institutions,” Paris Institute of Political Studies professor David Colon said in April last year.
Taiwan faces similar disinformation campaigns from China, which often targets young people through videos on platforms such as YouTube and TikTok, while enlisting local content creators to enhance credibility.
Taiwan and France have each pursued national strategies to counter disinformation, but there is significant potential for bilateral collaboration. France launched Viginum and French Response in 2021. Viginum monitors online platforms, analyzing content through a combination of AI and human expertise, while French Response provides a public-facing countermeasure, coordinating diplomatic and communicative responses to disruptive content.
Disinformation today often takes the form of memes or short and entertaining videos, and French Response adapts accordingly.
“It’s not just about fact-checking anymore. It’s about being proactive, using formats and tones that resonate,” France24 reported last week.
Taiwan has a similar approach. The Taiwan FactCheck Center (TFC) promotes media literacy through workshops, while the Ministry of Digital Affairs responds to disinformation with memes, infographics and short videos. The TFC also works with social media companies to flag, downrank or remove problematic content. Like France’s initiatives, Taiwan also uses AI tools to support its efforts.
There is room for Taiwan and France to collaborate, particularly on AI-driven solutions. Joint development of tools for detecting disinformation, automating responses and tracking sources could enhance both countries’ capabilities.
Taiwan should also remain vigilant toward domestic collaborators producing content that undermines the nation’s sovereignty or diminishes its dignity. Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Puma Shen (沈伯洋) suggested in December last year that the government provide a mechanism for the public to report such content and expose its creators.
AI could assist by applying digital watermarks to flagged content at the level of Internet service providers. Such watermarks would indicate disinformation, but would not block access; users could still view the content if they chose. A similar approach already exists for sites flagged as malicious.
Taiwan and France face a formidable challenge in countering foreign powers intent on disrupting their societies through disinformation. Both nations have accumulated valuable experience in tackling this threat, and a partnership could enhance their resilience, protect democratic institutions and empower citizens with trustworthy information. Broader collaboration could set a global example for defending democracy in the age of AI-driven disinformation.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
An American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) spokesperson on Saturday rebuked a Chinese official for mischaracterizing World War II-era agreements as proving that Taiwan was ceded to China. The US Department of State later affirmed that the AIT remarks reflect Washington’s long-standing position: Taiwan’s political status remains undetermined and should only be resolved peacefully. The US would continue supporting Taiwan against military, economic, legal and diplomatic pressure from China, and opposes any unilateral attempt to alter the “status quo,” particularly through coercion or force, the United Daily News cited the department as saying. The remarks followed Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs