Taiwan and France should cooperate on tackling disinformation and defending democratic values, French Senator Rachid Temal said during a meeting in Taipei on Tuesday.
Temal, chairman of the French Senate’s Taiwan Friendship Group, arrived in Taiwan on Sunday last week for a six-day trip, leading a delegation of French senators. He expressed hope that Taiwan and France would deepen cooperation not only in trade, but also in areas such as information security and ministerial exchanges to share practical experience in countering disinformation.
Disinformation from Russia has become an increasing concern in France, particularly over the past year. French authorities said they have found evidence of disinformation originating from Russia to sow discord online, much of it generated by artificial intelligence (AI).
“Those who spread disinformation aim to confuse us so much that we can no longer distinguish between truth and falsehood, and lose trust in our democracy and institutions,” Paris Institute of Political Studies professor David Colon said in April last year.
Taiwan faces similar disinformation campaigns from China, which often targets young people through videos on platforms such as YouTube and TikTok, while enlisting local content creators to enhance credibility.
Taiwan and France have each pursued national strategies to counter disinformation, but there is significant potential for bilateral collaboration. France launched Viginum and French Response in 2021. Viginum monitors online platforms, analyzing content through a combination of AI and human expertise, while French Response provides a public-facing countermeasure, coordinating diplomatic and communicative responses to disruptive content.
Disinformation today often takes the form of memes or short and entertaining videos, and French Response adapts accordingly.
“It’s not just about fact-checking anymore. It’s about being proactive, using formats and tones that resonate,” France24 reported last week.
Taiwan has a similar approach. The Taiwan FactCheck Center (TFC) promotes media literacy through workshops, while the Ministry of Digital Affairs responds to disinformation with memes, infographics and short videos. The TFC also works with social media companies to flag, downrank or remove problematic content. Like France’s initiatives, Taiwan also uses AI tools to support its efforts.
There is room for Taiwan and France to collaborate, particularly on AI-driven solutions. Joint development of tools for detecting disinformation, automating responses and tracking sources could enhance both countries’ capabilities.
Taiwan should also remain vigilant toward domestic collaborators producing content that undermines the nation’s sovereignty or diminishes its dignity. Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Puma Shen (沈伯洋) suggested in December last year that the government provide a mechanism for the public to report such content and expose its creators.
AI could assist by applying digital watermarks to flagged content at the level of Internet service providers. Such watermarks would indicate disinformation, but would not block access; users could still view the content if they chose. A similar approach already exists for sites flagged as malicious.
Taiwan and France face a formidable challenge in countering foreign powers intent on disrupting their societies through disinformation. Both nations have accumulated valuable experience in tackling this threat, and a partnership could enhance their resilience, protect democratic institutions and empower citizens with trustworthy information. Broader collaboration could set a global example for defending democracy in the age of AI-driven disinformation.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more