In the lead-up to the vote that ejected him from office this week after a mere nine months, the center-right French prime minister Francois Bayrou appeared stoically reconciled to his fate.
“There are worse disasters in life than the fall of a government,” Bayrou said on national radio, implicitly acknowledging his failure to win backing for a swingeing austerity strategy.
On Monday, members of parliament duly used a debate called by the prime minister himself to oust him.
And so another one bites the dust. The entrance to Matignon, France’s baroque prime ministerial residence, has become a revolving door during French President Emmanuel Macron’s benighted second term. Lacking a majority in a divided and deadlocked parliament, the president has gone through four prime ministers in a little more than three years. Following the departure of the latest, he announced his intention to appoint a fifth within days, rather than countenance a new election with far-right leader Marine Le Pen’s National Rally ahead in the polls.
Continuing instability and paralysis in the political mainstream would only enhance the far right’s prospects in the presidential elections in 2027. Without a fundamental strategic shift in the Elysee, there is no reason to believe that Bayrou’s successor would fare any better, or last any longer, than he did.
Outlining his budget plans during the summer, Bayrou disingenuously invoked a spirit of collective sacrifice in calling for the reduction of France’s public deficit. However, his cost-cutting measures focused on the less well-off, pensioners and those receiving welfare benefits, as he ignored calls to spread the pain upwards rather than downwards. Those political calculations faithfully reflected Macron’s economic priorities, which were encapsulated early on by decisions to abolish a wealth tax and ease the tax burden on big business.
Macron’s fundamental problem is that he no longer has a mandate for this socially divisive agenda. In the snap legislative elections he unwisely called last summer, his centrist bloc finished behind the New Popular Front, a left wing coalition of parties. Refusing to nominate a prime minister from the center-left, Macron has pushed on regardless of parliamentary arithmetic, displaying a characteristic lack of humility and an unwillingness to compromise.
In the twilight of a presidency beset by domestic crises and at times civil unrest, a different approach is beyond overdue. As the markets become increasingly restive over the political stasis in Paris, Macron’s immediate imperative is to find a prime minister who could pass a budget before the end of the year. That would not be possible without reaching some form of understanding with the Socialist Party, whose refusal to back Bayrou this week sealed his fate.
In exchange, Socialist Party leader Oliver Faure would seek concessions on issues such as the reintroduction of a wealth tax and increasing public investment. Macron would be loath to make them, but it is overwhelmingly in France’s interests that he does so.
On entering office, Macron presented himself as the grown up political antidote to the rise of the far right. However, the rancorous chaos at the heart of mainstream French politics is the gift that keeps on giving to Le Pen. Finally, belatedly, Macron should accept the consequences of the snap election and make a deal with the left.
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
In late January, Taiwan’s first indigenous submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), completed its first submerged dive, reaching a depth of roughly 50m during trials in the waters off Kaohsiung. By March, it had managed a fifth dive, still well short of the deep-water and endurance tests required before the navy could accept the vessel. The original delivery deadline of November last year passed months ago. CSBC Corp, Taiwan, the lead contractor, now targets June and the Ministry of National Defense is levying daily penalties for every day the submarine remains unfinished. The Hai Kun was supposed to be
Most schoolchildren learn that the circumference of the Earth is about 40,000km. They do not learn that the global economy depends on just 160 of those kilometers. Blocking two narrow waterways — the Strait of Hormuz and the Taiwan Strait — could send the economy back in time, if not to the Stone Age that US President Donald Trump has been threatening to bomb Iran back to, then at least to the mid-20th century, before the Rolling Stones first hit the airwaves. Over the past month and a half, Iran has turned the Strait of Hormuz, which is about 39km wide at
There is a peculiar kind of political theater unfolding in East Asia — one that would be laughable if its consequences were not so dangerous. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on April 12 returned from Beijing, where she met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and spoke earnestly about preserving “peace” and maintaining the “status quo.” It is a position that sounds responsible, even prudent. It is also a fiction. Taiwan is, by any honest definition, an independent country. It governs itself, defends itself, elects its leaders, and functions as a free and sovereign democracy. Independence is not a
RSS