The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days.
On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power.
Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several party members announced their candidacies. The KMT then decided to delay the registration period from Monday to Friday last week, to Monday to Friday next week — a move many believe is to buy time for Lu to reconsider.
Unlike the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which is known for frequent internal debates among factions, it is rare to see the KMT with such a crowded field for its leadership, which might be a good sign of democracy.
However, while some hopefuls had declared their candidacies as early as January, April and May, others only announced their bids after the “mass recall” attempt failed and Lu declined to run, seizing the opportunity at a moment when party morale was high.
Many KMT members and supporters have voiced concern that the party’s “A-list figures” — including Lu, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) and Taoyuan Mayor Simon Chang (張善政) — have all openly refused to enter the race.
Adding to the intrigue, Chu on Thursday said he had appointed former Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) to the KMT’s central review committee chairpersons’ group. As Jaw has long been rumored to harbor ambitions for the party leadership — and membership in the committee is a prerequisite for candidacy — speculation has grown that Chu is giving him a tacit “green light.”
Unusually, some contenders have also made it clear that their ultimate goal is to pave the way for a Lu presidential bid in 2028. For example, KMT Legislator Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) has said that if elected chairman, he would nominate Lu as the party’s presidential candidate and then hand over his post to her — prompting questions over whether some are merely running as “caretaker chairpersons” until Lu completes her mayoral term.
Another striking feature of the race is that many potential candidates are holding tight to the idea that a “blue-white” alliance with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) is the indispensable path for the KMT to return to power. Several have even pledged formal cooperation with the TPP as a guarantee of the party’s future success.
Yet making “working with the TPP” a prerequisite for KMT leadership has created complications. For example, former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) has long been seen as antagonistic toward TPP founder Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), and his chairmanship could hinder the blue-white collaboration. Nevertheless, Hau surprised many last week by publicly backing Ko’s release from detention, an apparent “olive branch” to the TPP. Meanwhile, Jaw has said he would step aside if Hau were to enter the race.
This prerequisite also narrows the KMT’s own bargaining space, handing leverage to the much smaller TPP, which itself is facing major uncertainties. TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is set to vacate his legislative seat in January to run for New Taipei City mayor, while Ko was granted bail on Friday.
With morale boosted by the failed mass recall campaign, KMT supporters expect the next chairperson to deliver victory in next year’s local elections and lead the party back to power in 2028.
However, with its “superstar” Lu unwilling to shoulder the responsibility, uncertainty is spreading, and more twists are likely to emerge.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic