Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers.
The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators.
The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had failed to apply for a permit, Taipei police said.
A disturbing photo surfaced following the demonstration, which showed Huang standing in the sea of protesters with his left arm wrapped around the neck of police officer Chen Yu-chien (陳育健).
In response, Huang insisted that he had merely placed his arm on the officer’s shoulder, citing an artificial intelligence (AI)-altered photo of Chen smiling as “proof” that he meant no harm.
Huang later taunted President William Lai (賴清德), telling the administration to “bring it on,” treating the confrontation as a political spectacle and shrugging it off as unfounded political persecution.
While one might characterize Huang’s behavior as bizarre and, frankly, unacceptable for someone in his position, this was by no means an isolated incident. It was simply the latest act in Huang’s ongoing reckless political theater.
Huang played a recording at a legislative hearing in June that seemed to reveal a prosecutor aggressively interrogating a suspect — an apparent infringement of the Personal Data Protection Act (個人資料保護法).
He later revealed the “recording” was AI-generated, calling it an “illustrative example” of “threatening tone and insulting language.”
With his extensive background in law, Huang should be fully aware of the legal implications of his actions. It is clear that he is acting with deliberate intent to sow discord — repeatedly flouting regulations and daring the authorities to hold him accountable has become a deliberate feature of his political playbook.
Huang’s bold disregard for the law mirrors his striking political transformation — once a rather progressive activist, he has come to refashion himself into a right-leaning populist, turning his politics into a series of performative confrontations.
Under his leadership, the TPP has increasingly echoed the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) agenda, aligning with the KMT to force through legislation using their combined majority in the legislature.
The TPP has become a convenient auxiliary to the KMT — less a viable alternative and more a willing attack dog to be released whenever an opportunity to inflame division presents itself.
Since assuming the chairmanship in January, Huang has made no effort to hide what appears to be a personal vendetta against the Democratic Progressive Party and Lai himself. He has repeatedly labeled the president a dictator and openly stated that his primary goal is to unseat Lai in the 2028 presidential election.
Huang’s exact motives are unclear, but it is evident that his chaos is calculated, and could very well be a tool for advancing his political ambitions.
He has already confirmed his intent to run for New Taipei City mayor next year, signaling that his provocations are not just for show, but part of a broader strategy to boost his political profile and consolidate power.
That is precisely what makes Huang so dangerous — not his repeated disorderly stunts, but that his theatrics are weaponized through a formal political platform and sustained by a devoted following.
An opportunist bent on manufacturing discord and disregarding the rule of law is already cause for concern, but one legitimized by institutional authority and backed by a zealous base poses a far greater threat to Taiwan’s political stability.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
RSS