Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II.
China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko and Myanmar’s junta chief Min Aung Hlaing.
Birds of a feather flock together. All throughout the world — regardless of nationality or ethnicity — the only people willing to attend a military parade with Xi are dictators. Yet these Taiwanese pan-blue figures also chose to stand alongside a dictator.
According to the historical perspective long upheld by the KMT, the victory in the war of resistance against Japan was achieved by the Nationalist government and military, led by Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石). Not only was the CCP not the main force that resisted the Japanese invasion, it often hindered the KMT. Then-CCP leader Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) “7-2-1 strategy” — placing 70 percent of the focus on developing strength, 20 percent on government and 10 percent on resisting Japan — perfectly summarizes the party’s strategic intentions at the time.
These pan-blue political figures might worship Chiang’s spirit tablet at home and love paying respects at his mausoleum during elections to boost their visibility, but the moment the CCP calls, they change their tune. Such behavior can only be described as extreme opportunism.
The CCP has not ruled out the possibility of using military force against Taiwan. In recent years, it has continued to pressure Taiwan — circling it with military aircraft and naval vessels, and conducting military drills. The troops, strategic weapons and equipment showcased in Beijing are all tools the CCP use to intimidate Taiwanese. If these political figures still insisted on participating under such circumstances, can they be considered true Taiwanese?
Huang Wei-ping works in public service.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS