Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing.
The representatives last month also attended an annual forum hosted by the Taiwan High-Tech Facility Association to discuss the creation of advanced chip fabs. Association members such as United Integrated Services Co and Marketech International Corp help TSMC build manufacturing facilities in Taiwan and overseas, and are known for their incredible efficiency. It takes one-and-a-half to two years for TSMC to build a new factory, outpacing the three to five years it takes global rivals, such as Intel Corp, to set up a fab.
Operating a chip plant in the science park is efficient, lowering operating costs and fostering technology development, which are essential for firms to be able to produce new and cost-competitive technologies. Companies in Taiwan’s science parks are eligible for lower rent and utility costs, and can more easily acquire talent, compared with traditional “industrial areas” created by the central and local governments.
To facilitate the formation of industrial clusters in the science parks, Taiwan set up “single windows” to assist companies in solving problems related to factory construction or the creation of start-ups. With heavy government investment, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry cluster and TSMC were created in the Hsinchu Science Park more than 30 years ago. The results are significant, as the semiconductor industry has become a key pillar of Taiwan’s economy.
The “Taiwan model” has even become a talking point for Taipei’s negotiations with Washington to lower the US’ “reciprocal” tariff and gain preferential rates for semiconductors and related products under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act of 1962. Vice Premier Cheng Li-chiun (鄭麗君), who leads the tariff talks, earlier this month said that both sides are exploring the possibility of expanding investment in the US through the “Taiwan model,” under which Taipei would help the US build industrial parks, similar to those in Taiwan.
Local semiconductor component and equipment suppliers had previously avoided setting up operations in the US given the expensive labor costs, but the situation has reversed. Two or three years ago, most Taiwanese corporate executives thought it would be a long shot for the US to reproduce the Hsinchu Science Park. Some said it would not happen during their lifetime. Now they have changed their tune after TSMC increased its total investment in the US to US$165 billion, which implies a significant increase in demand.
The development raises concerns about the outflow of experienced talent, which could undermine the development of the local semiconductor industry and Taiwan’s economy. Compared with imminent tariff risks and escalating geopolitical risks, that should be a longer-term worry, as Taiwan has spent three decades perfecting its chip ecosystem, which cannot be overturned in the blink of an eye. Facing such challenges, Taiwan should consider how to use this business opportunity to spur an industrial transformation. For smaller-scale component and development suppliers, it represents a once-in-a-lifetime chance to expand overseas; for others, it could mean a painful restructuring.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
RSS