On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year.
It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary.
Second, many emergency departments acknowledge that overcrowding mainly stems from a lack of nursing staff, which limits the availability of beds and leaves severely ill people waiting in the emergency room. Mild to moderate cases are not the primary cause of emergency room congestion. UCCs charge NT$150 for a visit, compared with NT$750 for an emergency visit at a major hospital.
This might provide some incentive, but a difference of just NT$600 might not be enough for people who are anxious about their health. For them, a few advanced tests might be worth the cost, and many could choose to bypass the UCC and head straight to the emergency room.
Taiwan’s healthcare accessibility is among the best in the world. People enjoy the freedom to seek care directly at major medical institutions without first seeking a referral. However, statistics show that the National Health Insurance (NHI) costs for outpatient visits at major hospitals are nearly four times higher than those of local clinics. Taiwan’s so-called tiered healthcare system has yet to be fully implemented.
The National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA) justified the establishment of UCCs by citing that about 80 percent of primary healthcare institutions across the nation remain open on Saturdays, but only about 20 percent operate on Sundays.
This reasoning is not entirely sound. Nearly no primary healthcare institutions are open on holidays in other countries, such as the US and Japan. Taiwan’s holiday opening rate for primary healthcare institutions is already quite high by comparison. In Japan, holidays are reserved for handling only severe emergencies, while mild cases — such as those UCCs are meant to treat — are typically not addressed. Taiwanese have grown accustomed to the low cost, accessibility and convenience of the NHI system and continue to use it extensively.
Public satisfaction with the NHI system exceeds 90 percent, and foreign visitors are often amazed by Taiwan’s high efficiency and low cost of medical treatment. Behind this success, however, are the hard work and sacrifices of the nation’s healthcare workers: It is because of this that the prestige once associated with the medical field has gradually dimmed, and the healthcare system has repeatedly faced threats of collapse.
Keeping in line with the spirit of a tiered healthcare system and considering that about 80 percent — about 9,600 — of primary healthcare institutions across Taiwan remain open on Saturdays, and about 20 percent — or more than 2,400 — operate on Sundays, the NHIA should implement two measures.
First, it should strengthen incentives for primary healthcare institutions to operate on holidays by modeling the reward system announced for the upcoming Lunar New Year holiday and multiplying consultation fees.
Second, it should consider implementing a mandatory referral system for tiered healthcare on holidays — people should be required to obtain a referral from a primary healthcare institution before visiting a major hospital or else pay higher registration fees and copayments. This system could then gradually be expanded to apply on weekdays.
Without such measures, it would be extremely difficult to effectively implement a tiered healthcare system, NHI resources would continue to be wasted, healthcare workers would remain overburdened, and issues of overcrowding in emergency departments and the impending collapse of the medical system would remain impossible to resolve.
Lin Yung-zen is the director of the Taiwan Primary Care Association.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS