The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?”
Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society.
In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data. An authoritarian regime just needs one command to make someone economically disappear.
During Hong Kong’s anti-extradition bill protests, demonstrators’ credit card records became clues to track them. In China’s Xinjiang region, even buying fuel with cash can raise suspicions.
When China’s central bank first began promoting its digital yuan, it sounded quite appealing — counterfeit-resistant, convenient and secure. The reality is that it is a state-level financial surveillance system. Every transaction can be tracked in an instant and anonymity is virtually nonexistent.
The government can impose time limits, regional restrictions and usage conditions, and subsidies can only be spent within a specified time frame or area. Such currency is no longer circulating money — rather, it is a management tool.
Documents state that the digital yuan could help achieve social governance and macroeconomic control. It could be frozen, revoked, flagged or punished — erasing a person’s economic existence in the blink of an eye. The more efficient digital currency becomes in the hands of the regime, the faster freedoms die.
While Taiwan’s banknote redesign might seem traditional, it is actually quite avant-garde. By choosing to update its paper currency, Taiwan is refusing to be ruled by algorithms. Cash allows the public to preserve their privacy. The redesign is more than just an anti-counterfeiting measure — it is the most basic pledge of freedom that could be made in a democratic society.
China’s move to eliminate paper money reflects a power grab, while Taiwan’s banknote redesign is a choice rooted in trust.
Shen Yan is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS