The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?”
Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society.
In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data. An authoritarian regime just needs one command to make someone economically disappear.
During Hong Kong’s anti-extradition bill protests, demonstrators’ credit card records became clues to track them. In China’s Xinjiang region, even buying fuel with cash can raise suspicions.
When China’s central bank first began promoting its digital yuan, it sounded quite appealing — counterfeit-resistant, convenient and secure. The reality is that it is a state-level financial surveillance system. Every transaction can be tracked in an instant and anonymity is virtually nonexistent.
The government can impose time limits, regional restrictions and usage conditions, and subsidies can only be spent within a specified time frame or area. Such currency is no longer circulating money — rather, it is a management tool.
Documents state that the digital yuan could help achieve social governance and macroeconomic control. It could be frozen, revoked, flagged or punished — erasing a person’s economic existence in the blink of an eye. The more efficient digital currency becomes in the hands of the regime, the faster freedoms die.
While Taiwan’s banknote redesign might seem traditional, it is actually quite avant-garde. By choosing to update its paper currency, Taiwan is refusing to be ruled by algorithms. Cash allows the public to preserve their privacy. The redesign is more than just an anti-counterfeiting measure — it is the most basic pledge of freedom that could be made in a democratic society.
China’s move to eliminate paper money reflects a power grab, while Taiwan’s banknote redesign is a choice rooted in trust.
Shen Yan is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Tuesday returned from her visit to the US, where she had met with several US senators and representatives, think tanks, and overseas Taiwanese and Chinese communities, espousing her vision of promoting cross-strait dialogue as a way to evade war. On Monday last week, she sat down with US academic Orville Schell and Asia Society Policy Institute distinguished fellow Daniel Russel. Russel is a seasoned diplomat who has served in positions related to East Asian and Indo-Pacific affairs. At the conclusion of the discussion, Russel employed his considerable diplomatic experience and knowledge
I arrived in Taiwan when I was 18, fresh out of high school and trying to navigate university life. Everything felt unfamiliar. My broken Mandarin quickly revealed what I already knew: I was not from here. When I told people I was from Indonesia, many told me that I did not look Indonesian. This caught me off guard, not because it was cruel, but because of how casually it was said. Sometimes it came with curiosity, sometimes surprise, occasionally admiration for my “fair skin.” More often than not, the people asking meant no harm. It is understandable. I look ethnically
Nearly three decades after the 1997 handover, Hong Kong has become a paradox: a place where financial dynamism coexists with political repression — a reality Taiwan cannot afford to ignore. Despite a sharp contraction of civic freedoms since 2020, Hong Kong remains a major global financial center. It has recently overtaken Switzerland as the world’s largest offshore wealth hub, supported by steady inflows of capital from China and across Asia. The territory continues to serve as a key intermediary linking Chinese firms, multinational investors and global markets. Institutional continuity has played a role. The Hong Kong dollar’s peg to the
In the aftermath of China’s expulsion of the New York Times correspondent Vivian Wang (王月眉), Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Lin Jian (林劍) has publicly and explicitly articulated Beijing’s core thinking on the Taiwan issue. Chinese authorities accused the newspaper of promoting what they called “Taiwan independence fallacies,” and said that its description of Taiwan as a country amounts to a challenge to the “one China” principle. The significance of the incident goes beyond the reporting dispute and has given the international community a window into the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) attitude toward Taiwan. Lin, in a statement, said
RSS