The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has its chairperson election tomorrow. Although the party has long positioned itself as “China friendly,” the election is overshadowed by “an overwhelming wave of Chinese intervention.”
The six candidates vying for the chair are former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), former lawmaker Cheng Li-wen (鄭麗文), Legislator Luo Chih-chiang (羅智強), Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), former National Assembly representative Tsai Chih-hong (蔡志弘) and former Changhua County comissioner Zhuo Bo-yuan (卓伯源).
While Cheng and Hau are front-runners in different surveys, Hau has complained of an online defamation campaign against him coming from accounts with foreign IP addresses, including a fabricated video showing Hau kissing a Taipei city councilor in public.
Former Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) alleged that a significant number of the Web accounts attacking Hau are based in China, and using artificial intelligence (AI) this adroitly to fabricate fake images and the sheer quantity of “fake news” has displayed capabilities beyond an individual Internet user.
According to Jaw and a preliminary investigation by the National Security Bureau, in the past month, there were more than 1,200 video clips about the KMT election being released on Chinese TikTok (Douyin) and YouTube, most of which criticize Hau, but praise Cheng, who has frequently echoed China’s “one China principle,” vowed to “make all Taiwanese proud to be ‘Chinese,’” and is widely seen as more China-leaning.
China has a long history of interference in other countries’ political affairs and elections in support of its geopolitical objectives, targeting Taiwan and other democratic countries to support candidates most in line with the ambitious authoritarian’s interests. The US, Canada, South Korea, the Philippines and several European countries all have given evidence accusing China of interfering in elections.
During Taiwan’s presidential election last year, the National Security Bureau recorded at least 115 cases of Chinese interference operations, including sponsoring specific groups’ electioneering and trips to China for vote-buying purposes, as well as recruiting online influencers to build support for pro-China candidates, while stigmatizing the government and ruling party to accelerate social fracturing.
Ironically, though the KMT has long been identified as a China-leaning party, it cannot avoid China’s devious interference and manipulation in its elections. These incidents have been a warning that Beijing’s political interventions and interference not only target the ruling government and party, but now extend to the opposition.
KMT politicians have repeatedly hindered legislation to counter Beijing’s hostile cognitive warfare activities, “gray zone” tactics and political infiltrations. The party even proposed legislation to amend or abolish the Anti-infiltration Act (反滲透法) after KMT dignitaries, such as former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?), took trips to China.
Now the party has to eat the bitter fruit. Jaw and other KMT heavyweights have called on Beijing to stop meddling in KMT elections, and declared a national security incident that should be contained.
No matter who wins the KMT election, China’s political infiltration and manipulations targeting Taiwanese political parties are going to continue.
To counter hostile foreign interventions and attacks is a substantial challenge and would take lots of effort, such as cybersecurity and AI technology upgrades, as well as legislative amendments and enforcement, including the National Security Act (國家安全法), Anti-infiltration Act (反滲透法) and Cyber Security Management Act (資通安全管理法). Most importantly, all political parties should work together to defend national security and against external threats.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
RSS