The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has its chairperson election tomorrow. Although the party has long positioned itself as “China friendly,” the election is overshadowed by “an overwhelming wave of Chinese intervention.”
The six candidates vying for the chair are former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), former lawmaker Cheng Li-wen (鄭麗文), Legislator Luo Chih-chiang (羅智強), Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), former National Assembly representative Tsai Chih-hong (蔡志弘) and former Changhua County comissioner Zhuo Bo-yuan (卓伯源).
While Cheng and Hau are front-runners in different surveys, Hau has complained of an online defamation campaign against him coming from accounts with foreign IP addresses, including a fabricated video showing Hau kissing a Taipei city councilor in public.
Former Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) alleged that a significant number of the Web accounts attacking Hau are based in China, and using artificial intelligence (AI) this adroitly to fabricate fake images and the sheer quantity of “fake news” has displayed capabilities beyond an individual Internet user.
According to Jaw and a preliminary investigation by the National Security Bureau, in the past month, there were more than 1,200 video clips about the KMT election being released on Chinese TikTok (Douyin) and YouTube, most of which criticize Hau, but praise Cheng, who has frequently echoed China’s “one China principle,” vowed to “make all Taiwanese proud to be ‘Chinese,’” and is widely seen as more China-leaning.
China has a long history of interference in other countries’ political affairs and elections in support of its geopolitical objectives, targeting Taiwan and other democratic countries to support candidates most in line with the ambitious authoritarian’s interests. The US, Canada, South Korea, the Philippines and several European countries all have given evidence accusing China of interfering in elections.
During Taiwan’s presidential election last year, the National Security Bureau recorded at least 115 cases of Chinese interference operations, including sponsoring specific groups’ electioneering and trips to China for vote-buying purposes, as well as recruiting online influencers to build support for pro-China candidates, while stigmatizing the government and ruling party to accelerate social fracturing.
Ironically, though the KMT has long been identified as a China-leaning party, it cannot avoid China’s devious interference and manipulation in its elections. These incidents have been a warning that Beijing’s political interventions and interference not only target the ruling government and party, but now extend to the opposition.
KMT politicians have repeatedly hindered legislation to counter Beijing’s hostile cognitive warfare activities, “gray zone” tactics and political infiltrations. The party even proposed legislation to amend or abolish the Anti-infiltration Act (反滲透法) after KMT dignitaries, such as former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?), took trips to China.
Now the party has to eat the bitter fruit. Jaw and other KMT heavyweights have called on Beijing to stop meddling in KMT elections, and declared a national security incident that should be contained.
No matter who wins the KMT election, China’s political infiltration and manipulations targeting Taiwanese political parties are going to continue.
To counter hostile foreign interventions and attacks is a substantial challenge and would take lots of effort, such as cybersecurity and AI technology upgrades, as well as legislative amendments and enforcement, including the National Security Act (國家安全法), Anti-infiltration Act (反滲透法) and Cyber Security Management Act (資通安全管理法). Most importantly, all political parties should work together to defend national security and against external threats.
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The
RSS