Taiwan’s democracy is entering a new stage, not defined solely by the familiar blue-green political rivalry, but by deeper, quieter shifts within society — generational divides, language changes and the influence of new technologies. These trends could reshape Taiwan’s political culture and make it more vulnerable to external influence.
For many young Taiwanese, politics feel distant and confrontational. They often view the older generation, who fought for democracy and engaged in fierce partisan struggles, as radical and aggressive. Having been born in a democratic system, young people do not share the same visceral connection to democracy as those who lived under authoritarianism. This gap in experience has created a fracture in society not only between parties, but also between generations. Together, the divisions have fostered an environment in which outside actors might easily intervene.
China’s influence is particularly visible in the realm of language and culture. Among young Taiwanese, linguistic habits are shifting, as Chinese expressions increasingly appear in daily conversation. The change is driven by constant exposure to Chinese content — dramas, celebrities, online videos and games. Language is never neutral; when it carries cultural references and frames of thought, it subtly shapes how people perceive the world.
The growing reliance on artificial intelligence (AI) deepens this trend. Tools such as DeepSeek and ChatGPT are largely trained on Chinese data. Regular use not only normalizes certain linguistic patterns, but also risks transmitting worldviews that align more closely with China’s.
This is not to say that Taiwanese are being indoctrinated. Rather, it illustrates how soft power, mediated through technology, can quietly build an attractive image of China. As a result, fewer young people see China as an imminent threat.
Another subtle, but significant change lies in the normalization of Taiwanese identity. For older generations, identifying as Taiwanese carried a sense of resistance — a stance against authoritarianism or Chinese pressure. For those born since democratization, being Taiwanese is simply natural. While normalization is progress, it also reduces the urgency to defend that identity. Decades without direct confrontation have dulled the existential threat. If identity no longer feels at risk, the motivation to safeguard it weakens.
Meanwhile, digital behavior raises additional concerns. Increasingly, young people turn to AI tools and social media platforms as their primary sources of information. Teachers report the consequences: greater exposure to misinformation and a rising tendency to believe it. Without strong media literacy, Taiwan risks raising a generation that is highly connected, yet more vulnerable to manipulation. Schools should play a central role in building critical thinking skills to counter this risk.
These shifts do not mean that young Taiwanese are disinterested in public life. On the contrary, the Blue Bird protests and participation in recall campaigns show that civic engagement is alive. What has changed is the framework through which young people interpret democracy, identity and threats. For them, stability, opportunity and cultural openness matter more than ideological battles.
The challenge is how Taiwan can channel these evolving values into a resilient democracy. Policymakers must recognize that defending Taiwan is not only about military deterrence or international alliances. It is also about cultivating democratic commitment at home, ensuring that young people understand the privileges and responsibilities of the system.
Young people are redefining what it means to be Taiwanese in the 21st century. The question is whether this redefinition would reinforce Taiwan’s democratic identity, or erode it under the weight of external influence and complacency. The answer depends on how quickly Taiwan acts to bridge its generational divides and invest in democratic literacy.
Elaine Ko is chief officer of operation at the Taiwan NextGen Foundation, specializing in Taiwan’s political and international affairs, Taiwan-South Korea relations and human rights.
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has
“Of course you can choose not to be Taiwanese, just do not stay here,” chairwoman of Taipei 101 operator Taipei Financial Center Corp Janet Chia (賈永婕) said in an online interview with local entertainer Tai Chih-yuan (邰智源), triggering intense discussion on social media, with politicians across party lines weighing in. In the interview, which was aired on May 14, Chia and Tai’s discussion over a meal in Taipei 101 covered Chia’s career change from entertainer to chairwoman and US climber Alex Honnold’s free solo climb up the Taipei 101 building. During the interview, Chia said, “Being on this land, we
RSS