Taiwan’s democracy is entering a new stage, not defined solely by the familiar blue-green political rivalry, but by deeper, quieter shifts within society — generational divides, language changes and the influence of new technologies. These trends could reshape Taiwan’s political culture and make it more vulnerable to external influence.
For many young Taiwanese, politics feel distant and confrontational. They often view the older generation, who fought for democracy and engaged in fierce partisan struggles, as radical and aggressive. Having been born in a democratic system, young people do not share the same visceral connection to democracy as those who lived under authoritarianism. This gap in experience has created a fracture in society not only between parties, but also between generations. Together, the divisions have fostered an environment in which outside actors might easily intervene.
China’s influence is particularly visible in the realm of language and culture. Among young Taiwanese, linguistic habits are shifting, as Chinese expressions increasingly appear in daily conversation. The change is driven by constant exposure to Chinese content — dramas, celebrities, online videos and games. Language is never neutral; when it carries cultural references and frames of thought, it subtly shapes how people perceive the world.
The growing reliance on artificial intelligence (AI) deepens this trend. Tools such as DeepSeek and ChatGPT are largely trained on Chinese data. Regular use not only normalizes certain linguistic patterns, but also risks transmitting worldviews that align more closely with China’s.
This is not to say that Taiwanese are being indoctrinated. Rather, it illustrates how soft power, mediated through technology, can quietly build an attractive image of China. As a result, fewer young people see China as an imminent threat.
Another subtle, but significant change lies in the normalization of Taiwanese identity. For older generations, identifying as Taiwanese carried a sense of resistance — a stance against authoritarianism or Chinese pressure. For those born since democratization, being Taiwanese is simply natural. While normalization is progress, it also reduces the urgency to defend that identity. Decades without direct confrontation have dulled the existential threat. If identity no longer feels at risk, the motivation to safeguard it weakens.
Meanwhile, digital behavior raises additional concerns. Increasingly, young people turn to AI tools and social media platforms as their primary sources of information. Teachers report the consequences: greater exposure to misinformation and a rising tendency to believe it. Without strong media literacy, Taiwan risks raising a generation that is highly connected, yet more vulnerable to manipulation. Schools should play a central role in building critical thinking skills to counter this risk.
These shifts do not mean that young Taiwanese are disinterested in public life. On the contrary, the Blue Bird protests and participation in recall campaigns show that civic engagement is alive. What has changed is the framework through which young people interpret democracy, identity and threats. For them, stability, opportunity and cultural openness matter more than ideological battles.
The challenge is how Taiwan can channel these evolving values into a resilient democracy. Policymakers must recognize that defending Taiwan is not only about military deterrence or international alliances. It is also about cultivating democratic commitment at home, ensuring that young people understand the privileges and responsibilities of the system.
Young people are redefining what it means to be Taiwanese in the 21st century. The question is whether this redefinition would reinforce Taiwan’s democratic identity, or erode it under the weight of external influence and complacency. The answer depends on how quickly Taiwan acts to bridge its generational divides and invest in democratic literacy.
Elaine Ko is chief officer of operation at the Taiwan NextGen Foundation, specializing in Taiwan’s political and international affairs, Taiwan-South Korea relations and human rights.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
On the last day of the extended legislative session on Friday last week, the Legislative Yuan, with a slight majority held by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), continued to refuse to review the government’s annual budget for this year, which is already overdue. It was the first time in Taiwan’s constitutional history that the government budget was not reviewed in its supposed legislative session. Instead, the opposition rushed to pass three controversial bills, which many people have criticized as self-serving. Since the Executive Yuan submitted its annual budget proposal to the Legislative Yuan in August last
RSS