Taiwan’s democracy is entering a new stage, not defined solely by the familiar blue-green political rivalry, but by deeper, quieter shifts within society — generational divides, language changes and the influence of new technologies. These trends could reshape Taiwan’s political culture and make it more vulnerable to external influence.
For many young Taiwanese, politics feel distant and confrontational. They often view the older generation, who fought for democracy and engaged in fierce partisan struggles, as radical and aggressive. Having been born in a democratic system, young people do not share the same visceral connection to democracy as those who lived under authoritarianism. This gap in experience has created a fracture in society not only between parties, but also between generations. Together, the divisions have fostered an environment in which outside actors might easily intervene.
China’s influence is particularly visible in the realm of language and culture. Among young Taiwanese, linguistic habits are shifting, as Chinese expressions increasingly appear in daily conversation. The change is driven by constant exposure to Chinese content — dramas, celebrities, online videos and games. Language is never neutral; when it carries cultural references and frames of thought, it subtly shapes how people perceive the world.
The growing reliance on artificial intelligence (AI) deepens this trend. Tools such as DeepSeek and ChatGPT are largely trained on Chinese data. Regular use not only normalizes certain linguistic patterns, but also risks transmitting worldviews that align more closely with China’s.
This is not to say that Taiwanese are being indoctrinated. Rather, it illustrates how soft power, mediated through technology, can quietly build an attractive image of China. As a result, fewer young people see China as an imminent threat.
Another subtle, but significant change lies in the normalization of Taiwanese identity. For older generations, identifying as Taiwanese carried a sense of resistance — a stance against authoritarianism or Chinese pressure. For those born since democratization, being Taiwanese is simply natural. While normalization is progress, it also reduces the urgency to defend that identity. Decades without direct confrontation have dulled the existential threat. If identity no longer feels at risk, the motivation to safeguard it weakens.
Meanwhile, digital behavior raises additional concerns. Increasingly, young people turn to AI tools and social media platforms as their primary sources of information. Teachers report the consequences: greater exposure to misinformation and a rising tendency to believe it. Without strong media literacy, Taiwan risks raising a generation that is highly connected, yet more vulnerable to manipulation. Schools should play a central role in building critical thinking skills to counter this risk.
These shifts do not mean that young Taiwanese are disinterested in public life. On the contrary, the Blue Bird protests and participation in recall campaigns show that civic engagement is alive. What has changed is the framework through which young people interpret democracy, identity and threats. For them, stability, opportunity and cultural openness matter more than ideological battles.
The challenge is how Taiwan can channel these evolving values into a resilient democracy. Policymakers must recognize that defending Taiwan is not only about military deterrence or international alliances. It is also about cultivating democratic commitment at home, ensuring that young people understand the privileges and responsibilities of the system.
Young people are redefining what it means to be Taiwanese in the 21st century. The question is whether this redefinition would reinforce Taiwan’s democratic identity, or erode it under the weight of external influence and complacency. The answer depends on how quickly Taiwan acts to bridge its generational divides and invest in democratic literacy.
Elaine Ko is chief officer of operation at the Taiwan NextGen Foundation, specializing in Taiwan’s political and international affairs, Taiwan-South Korea relations and human rights.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS