Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) last week made a rare visit to the Philippines, which not only deepened bilateral economic ties, but also signaled a diplomatic breakthrough in the face of growing tensions with China. Lin’s trip marks the second-known visit by a Taiwanese foreign minister since Manila and Beijing established diplomatic ties in 1975; then-minister Chang Hsiao-yen (章孝嚴) took a “vacation” in the Philippines in 1997.
As Taiwan is one of the Philippines’ top 10 economic partners, Lin visited Manila and other cities to promote the Taiwan-Philippines Economic Corridor, with an eye to connecting it with the Luzon Economic Corridor launched by the Philippines, the US and Japan to boost economic development, focusing on investments in clean energy, semiconductors and agribusiness among others. This demonstrates Taiwan’s efforts to integrate into the bigger US-Japan-led Indo-Pacific Economic Framework and non-red supply chains to counter China’s regional influence.
Lin’s visit came after Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr in April issued a memorandum easing decades-old restrictions on official exchanges with Taiwan, while Taipei extended visa-free entry for Philippine passport holders and the two countries inked a double taxation avoidance agreement to promote bilateral investment.
Accompanied by a delegation consisting of Taiwanese and American entrepreneurs, Lin’s visit aimed to extend Taiwan-US cooperation to a third area to bolster trilateral economic development. The trip symbolizes a major breakthrough to expand Taiwan’s diplomatic space and deepen its strategic partnership with the Philippines. Such a breakthrough is not limited to economic issues, but extends to defense and security. In May, Philippine Navy spokesman Rear Admiral Roy Vincent Trinidad talked about military-to-military engagement between the two nations’ navies, and a proposal to regularize warship transits through the Taiwan Strait and potentially engage in joint military activities, as Taiwan had sent observers to the US-Philippines-Japan Kamandag military exercises this year. Taiwan’s Coast Guard Administration and its Philippine counterpart have also carried out joint patrols of the Bashi Channel.
Prior to the Manila trip, Lin had traveled to Japan in July — the first public visit by a Taiwanese foreign minister since the two nations severed official ties in 1972. Lin met with Japanese lawmakers, visited the Osaka Expo site, and inspected Taiwan’s representative office and units in Japan.
While China has protested these visits by Taiwan’s top diplomat, it is its diplomatic and military intimidation that has spurred Taiwan’s thriving interactions with Japan and the Philippines. Lin made the visits against a backdrop of rising tensions between Beijing and Manila in the South China Sea, and between Tokyo and Beijing over China’s military intrusions into Japanese territories.
While Taiwan has proposed raising its defense budget next year to a record 3.32 percent of GDP amid rising military threats from China, Tokyo in its defense white paper referred to China as “the unprecedented biggest strategic threat to Japan,” and a Philippine survey showed that more than 85 percent of Filipinos distrust China and viewed it as the greatest threat to the country.
Beijing’s aggression shows that the security challenges facing Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan are interconnected. It is pushing the three major first island chain countries to team up as an evolving defense line to restrain Chinese expansionism in the region. Seeing China’s large military parade on Wednesday to showcase its military muscle and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), standing alongside Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, declaring that “China’s great rejuvenation is unstoppable,” the alliance of Taiwan, the Philippines, Japan and Western democracies is a necessity.
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS