Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today.
As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia.
Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view them solely within the context of great power competition and predominantly as reactions to Washington or Beijing, as opposed to being formulated autonomously.
Far from falling unguardedly within Beijing’s sphere of influence, India in fact issued clarifications on misrepresentations in the Mandarin transcription of Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi’s (王毅) statement during a meeting with Indian Minister of External Affairs S. Jaishankar on Monday last week.
In the transcript, Wang had declared that India recognizes Taiwan as “part of China.”
The Indian Ministry of External Affairs said this was not the case, that the Chinese side had raised the issue of Taiwan, and that “our position [on Taiwan] remains unchanged.”
Today on this page, Tamkang University Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies assistant professor Lin Hsiao-chen (林筱甄) in “India denies expanded ‘one China’” provides an eloquent analysis of why the Indian ministry was so quick to clarify this point. She gives a summary of the history of India’s “one China” policy and how it has remained consistent since India first recognized the People’s Republic of China in 1949, while China has over decades gradually extended the meaning of “one China” and weaponized it as a price for access to the Chinese market. The clarification was an intentional move to dismiss Beijing’s distortions and to protect New Delhi’s strategic calculus.
John Cheng, a retired businessman from Hong Kong, in his article “Tibet was not ‘always part’ of China,” provides another historical overview, exposing China’s mendacity in its claims over Tibet — distorting the truth to form the narrative it seeks to force upon the world.
Tibetans, Uighurs and Taiwanese are all victims of these distortions. The first two lack the platform to push back.
Taiwan has more of a platform, but the lack of international recognition weakens this. Meanwhile, as a major regional and global power, India has none of these restraints. Relations with India are important for Taiwan, not just because of increased exchange potential and shared values, interests and development complementarities, but also due to the importance of a regional security balance.
The importance of these relations were exemplified by India’s clarification of its official position on Taiwan. In the long term, Taiwan could certainly learn from India the wisdom of maintaining a principled and autonomous path, something that is increasingly necessary in these times of geopolitical flux.
To mark the 30th anniversary of the establishment of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center and the India Taipei Association in 1995, Hashmi wrote in the Taipei Times (“India-Taiwan relations at 30 years,” May 22, page 8) of the gradual yet perceptible improvement and advancement in India-Taiwan relations.
While there are things to celebrate, there is still much room for improvement, she said.
That is something the government should be working toward. An excellent place to start would be to reinstate direct flights between the two countries.
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS