Former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) strode out of the Taipei District Court on Monday with confidence after his release, sharply denouncing his “wrongful imprisonment” and claiming that Taiwan has been “torn apart by division” under President William Lai (賴清德).
His NT$70 million (US$2.31 million) bail became a prop on his political stage. His behavior was anything but low-profile — upon posting bail, he immediately upgraded his personal case to a national crisis, acting as if he were the embodiment of justice and momentarily forgetting that he was the defendant.
When faced with judicial investigations, politicians typically resort to two tactics. The first is to denounce the investigation as a political witch hunt — accusing political rivals of abusing authority to eliminate them. The second tactic is crying wrongful imprisonment, thereby elevating an individual case into a matter of systemic judicial injustice. Ko has combined the two tactics, using his language to tug on his supporters’ heartstrings. The system is broken — but the problem lies not with him.
The key issue at stake is whether the judiciary of a democratic nation can withstand repeated stigmatization. Taiwan’s judiciary is far from perfect, but it at the very least can provide a framework for scrutiny — one where evidence, not feelings, serve as the foundation for judgement. Ko’s rhetoric is an attempt to repackage himself as a victim, thereby negating the very value of procedural justice.
If a politician can simply cry “wrongful imprisonment” to override issues, how could their followers trust any court ruling? When the judiciary is pre-emptively framed as a tool for political persecution, any outcome would merely be viewed as part of a conspiracy. Such tactics do not serve to uncover the truth, but to dismantle the entire system.
Taiwan’s democratic foundation is built on a minimum level of trust in its institutions. When you lose an election, you trust in the ballot box. When you are investigated, you trust in the legal procedures. When politicians publicly stigmatize this foundation, they steer their supporters’ emotions to feed into even more extreme division. When Ko claims that the nation is “torn apart,” he is shifting the blame — turning a national crisis into a shield for his own political survival.
When politicians employ language as a catapult rather than a bridge for dialogue, they cut the cables supporting public reason. When the term “wrongful imprisonment” is repeatedly abused, how could it still meaningfully refer to actual judicial errors? Slogans fueled by emotion would only drift further from the truth. Such is the political soap opera that plays on repeat in Taiwanese society. This is the true cause of national division.
Judicial decisions must not exist in the shadow of politics. The system needs reform, but reform must be established on the grounds of evidence and due process — not on emotional slogans.
Those who once claimed to be “political outsiders” have become experts in using language to manipulate public sentiment. Ko’s role reversal of “white force” to “victim of wrongful imprisonment” was swift and shameless. In the end, the real victim is not Ko, but the system.
Allow the case to return to proper legal procedure — examine the evidence, conduct an open trial and accept the verdict. Preventing the nation from being “torn apart” is not difficult.
Liu Che-ting is a writer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had
Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) last week made a rare visit to the Philippines, which not only deepened bilateral economic ties, but also signaled a diplomatic breakthrough in the face of growing tensions with China. Lin’s trip marks the second-known visit by a Taiwanese foreign minister since Manila and Beijing established diplomatic ties in 1975; then-minister Chang Hsiao-yen (章孝嚴) took a “vacation” in the Philippines in 1997. As Taiwan is one of the Philippines’ top 10 economic partners, Lin visited Manila and other cities to promote the Taiwan-Philippines Economic Corridor, with an eye to connecting it with the Luzon
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several