The government on Tuesday said it is seeking an invitation for Taiwan to attend this month’s International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) assembly in Canada. Taiwan last took part in 2013, but every attempt since then has been blocked by Beijing. This exclusion, driven purely by politics, undermines global aviation safety and contradicts the ICAO’s stated mission.
Deputy Minister of Transportation and Communications Lin Kuo-hsien (林國顯) said that the ICAO’s new strategic plan for next year to 2050 carries the theme “Safe Skies, Sustainable Future.” The plan emphasizes resilience, inclusiveness and cooperation. Yet Taiwan’s continued exclusion makes a mockery of that vision.
The Taipei Flight Information Region (FIR) handled about 1.65 million flights last year. That number highlights Taiwan’s central role in regional aviation. Despite being denied ICAO membership, Taiwan has managed the Taipei FIR safely through informal cooperation with neighboring countries. However, reliance on ad hoc arrangements is no substitute for participation in formal mechanisms of coordination and arbitration.
The Taiwan Strait is one of the most volatile flashpoints in the world, and airspace in the region can change at a moment’s notice. Taiwan’s exclusion means its aviation authorities cannot directly engage with the ICAO when risks arise. This danger was demonstrated in February last year when China shifted the M503 flight route eastward, bringing it closer to the median line of the Taiwan Strait despite Taipei’s protests. That decision placed civilian flights at risk, as airspace near the median line is frequently used by Chinese and Taiwanese military aircraft.
Beijing escalated the problem in July, when it announced that it would activate the W121 route connecting Dongshan in China’s Zhejiang Province to the M503 route. Such unilateral moves prompted four members of the US Congress to write to ICAO Secretary-General Juan Carlos Salazar, urging him to clarify the organization’s opposition to these actions and to reconsider Taiwan’s exclusion. The bipartisan letter — signed by Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn, Democratic Senator Gary Peters, Republican Representative John Moolenaar and Democratic Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi — said the changes violate international aviation procedures and contradict the ICAO’s own standards requiring coordination in shared airspace.
Other nations, including Canada, Japan, Sweden and the Netherlands, have also voiced concern about Beijing’s unilateral maneuvers. The international community understands that aviation safety should not be subject to political manipulation.
Taiwan has already experienced the consequences of being sidelined. In 2022, after then-US House of Representatives speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taipei, Beijing staged massive military exercises around Taiwan, firing multiple ballistic missiles into nearby waters. The drills, announced with little warning, forced hundreds of flights to be canceled or rerouted. With no access to the ICAO, Taiwan’s aviation authorities had to coordinate rerouting through the Japanese and Philippine FIRs.
The logic behind Taiwan’s exclusion is not only flawed, but dangerous. Just as Taiwan’s exclusion from the WHO harmed the world during the COVID-19 pandemic, its exclusion from the ICAO threatens global aviation. When Taiwanese in China first raised alarms about a new virus, Taiwan relayed the warnings to the WHO. Yet the WHO ignored them because Taiwan is not a member, helping the virus spread worldwide.
The UN was established after World War II to preserve peace and security, and to ensure tyranny would never again dominate the international order. Taiwan, under the Republic of China government, was a UN founding member. It is a dangerous absurdity that Taiwan is excluded at the demand of an authoritarian regime that has never governed it.
The world should not allow Beijing to endanger aviation. Taiwan’s participation in the ICAO is not just a matter of fairness or recognition, but an urgent necessity for the safety of global aviation.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS