What do you do when you find yourself abandoned in your hour of greatest need?
That is the question many in Pakistan would be asking, as the second flood disaster in three years looms. Monsoon rainfall in Punjab Province has already affected 2 million people and killed at least 880. About 60 percent of Punjab’s rice crop and 30 percent of its sugarcane has been lost.
Worse might be yet to come. The rainy season would not end for another month, and the waters are crossing into Sindh Province, the worst-hit region by 2022 floods that submerged one-third of the country, killed more than 1,700 people, caused US$40 billion of damage and cut economic growth by 2.2 percent.
Pakistan’s roughly 250 million people have barely begun to recover from that catastrophe. Of the US$30 billion sought to rebuild the country after 2022, only US$11 billion was pledged by development banks and other donors, and just US$4.5 billion has been spent on flood recovery by June.
That is less than the about US$4.6 billion of “aid” in the donor package dedicated by oil exporters to allow Pakistan to pay for its crude on credit — hardly the best way of responding to a disaster made more likely by climate change. Development banks cannot accept all the blame: There simply were not enough investable projects looking for funds, Pakistani Minister of Finance and Revenue Muhammad Aurangzeb said.
How is one of the world’s poorest countries going to fix this as the blows from global warming keep coming thicker and faster? Believe it or not, there is a hopeful lesson in one of the darkest episodes of Pakistan’s own history.
In 1970, modern Bangladesh was a province of Pakistan, and found itself in a similar place. The Bhola Cyclone that year was the deadliest on record, killing an estimated 300,000 people as its storm surge inundated the low-lying country.
Its victims found themselves abandoned by those they turned to for help: In this case, the west Pakistani elite, who made only fitful attempts at disaster relief, then blocked Bengali politicians from power after an election, and finally unleashed ethnic cleansing to suppress the growing nationalist movement.
Bangladesh’s long road from that war-torn moment to its present status, as an independent country about 50 percent richer than Pakistan itself, is a testament to what change from below can accomplish. Despite its own deep vulnerability to natural disasters, the country has suffered fewer flood deaths in the past 25 years than Pakistan has experienced since 2020.
That has largely been achieved without the sort of large-scale infrastructure that the likes of China and Japan have used to bulletproof themselves against catastrophes, and that Pakistan has neither the funding nor the project pipeline to build.
What has been the secret? A crucial factor has been putting more power in the hands of women. Across South Asia, women are disproportionately at risk during natural disasters, in part because of fears of dishonor, violence and looting if they leave the family home to evacuate to shelters or relief camps. During 1991’s Cyclone Gorky in the Bay of Bengal, women accounted for about 93 percent of the 140,000 killed.
Fixing such cultural issues can be hard, but Bangladesh has had success recruiting more women as disaster volunteers and early-warning coordinators. As those reforms have spread, death tolls in more recent cyclones hitting the country have been far lower, and more evenly balanced between genders.
Pakistan has been learning a similar lesson: About 37 percent of housing grants under a World Bank program to rebuild from the 2022 floods have gone to women.
Empowering women is also going to be crucial to the development that Pakistan would need if it wants to free itself of dependence on donor nations — an important consideration, considering the way the aid budgets of the US and UK, two of the biggest donors, have been eviscerated this year.
Bangladesh’s economic miracle has been built by the millions of women who have flocked to its garment industry, turning it into the world’s largest apparel exporter after China. About 44 percent of women now have jobs, a share that exceeds Italy. (In Pakistan, by contrast, only 32 percent of women even have access to a mobile phone.)
That has spurred urbanization and investment, both of which have now overtaken rates seen in Pakistan. With each passing year, a less poverty-stricken Bangladesh gets better at protecting itself against the damage from climate change.
Pakistan has no shortage of grand plans to fix its climate vulnerability, but its greatest hope is in such grassroots change — as demonstrated by its photovoltaics boom, which is turning it into one of the most rapid adopters of solar energy on the planet. With labor costs now lower than those of Bangladesh, whose minimum wage is far below a living income, it might even have the opportunity to copy the boom of its former province.
Floods have always been devastating, but after the waters recede, they can nurture a new era of growth.
David Fickling is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering climate change and energy. Previously, he worked for Bloomberg News, the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had
Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) last week made a rare visit to the Philippines, which not only deepened bilateral economic ties, but also signaled a diplomatic breakthrough in the face of growing tensions with China. Lin’s trip marks the second-known visit by a Taiwanese foreign minister since Manila and Beijing established diplomatic ties in 1975; then-minister Chang Hsiao-yen (章孝嚴) took a “vacation” in the Philippines in 1997. As Taiwan is one of the Philippines’ top 10 economic partners, Lin visited Manila and other cities to promote the Taiwan-Philippines Economic Corridor, with an eye to connecting it with the Luzon