The 80th session of the UN General Assembly is to open on Tuesday next week. The first day of the high-level General Debate is to be held on Sept. 23. Important topics are to include a focus on the ongoing need for international cooperation to address global conflicts, inequality and health crises, all within the broader context of a world working toward a more peaceful, healthy and prosperous future.
Taiwan’s inclusion in the UN and other international organizations is important for the global community. Regrettably, although all 193 member states are represented in this unique forum, Taiwan is barred, even though it is one of the leading economies in the world and willing to cooperate on a wide array of international issues covered by the UN Charter.
Taiwanese have worked hard to accomplish remarkable economic, political and social changes over the past 70-plus years. Taipei has shared its success by providing economic aid to other Asian countries, as well as states in Latin America and Africa. Neglecting Taiwan’s population is a gross violation of the universality of membership principles of the UN.
Taiwanese deserve better. The UN should take immediate action to resolve the inappropriate exclusion of Taiwan’s 23 million people. Its discriminatory policy against Taiwanese passport holders and journalists violates their fundamental human rights and should be rectified.
Moreover, the UN should ensure that Taiwan has the right to participate in an equal and dignified manner in activities related to the implementation of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals.
China has been bullying Taiwan for many years. Although Taiwan enjoys de facto independence, China’s ultimate goal is to annex it. The US must not let that happen. As a dynamic and long-time US ally devoted to regional peace and stability, Taiwan is quietly carving out a role as a component of the region’s security architecture. The administration of US President Donald Trump must take a close look at Taiwan’s role within the region, and how it can cooperate on security matters and help strengthen the US’ regional leadership. Using Taiwan as a bargaining chip is no way to counter Beijing’s belligerence.
Bidding to participate in the UN system has never been easy. Despite the difficulty, years of hard work by Taiwanese civil society and the overseas Taiwanese community have led to increasing international support. If Trump really wants to get tough with China on trade, he should take advantage of the benefits Taiwan can offer. Unlike China, Taiwan has developed into an established democracy. It has a robust civil society with healthy and free independent media. Had Trump considered the remarkable achievements of Taiwan, he could have been in a better position to deal with Beijing.
Taiwan’s strong position in the world is underpinned by its thriving democracy, its economic prowess and its attractive social values. Furthermore, Taiwan has a permanent population, a defined territory and a democratically elected government, meeting all the criteria for statehood under the Montevideo Convention of 1934. It has never come under the jurisdiction of the People’s Republic of China.
The US should add its vote to those who believe Taiwan has earned a UN seat.
As the international community faces an unprecedented number of complex and global issues, it is critical for all stakeholders to help address these problems. Taiwan’s meaningful participation in the UN system is not a political issue, but a pragmatic one. It is time for Taiwan to be allowed to join the 80th session of the General Assembly.
Kent Wang is an advisory commissioner for the Overseas Community Affairs Council of the Republic of China (Taiwan) in the US and a research fellow at the Institute for Taiwan-America Studies.
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase