The conflict along the Thai-Cambodian border has resulted in numerous casualties, displaced residents, caused significant damage to heritage sites and left unexploded bombs scattered across the region. The conflict poses a serious threat to people’s safety, and has caused panic and deep psychological trauma.
Although I have lived in Taiwan for more than 20 years, as a Cambodian immigrant, my emotional ties to my homeland and loved ones remain strong. I closely follow the events in Cambodia and hope that the Taiwanese media can report on the conflict objectively.
Since the start of the dispute, media reports have tended to be one-sided, which can inflame ethnic tensions or cause people who lack a full understanding of the situation to become hostile toward Cambodians.
Several of my Thai and Cambodian friends in Taiwan say the cultures and lifestyles of people in both countries are similar, and that their interactions are generally friendly. No one wants the border conflict to create hatred between the nations. That is why journalists must verify facts, and uphold the standards and social responsibility expected of mass media, to avoid creating more misunderstanding and fear.
There must also be an immediate ceasefire to prevent escalation.
Since the conflict broke out on July 24, many civilians who live or do business on the border have been forced to flee, including pregnant women, new mothers and infants. Seeing them running for safety, trying to protect their children, is heartbreaking. Many displaced people are staying in refugee shelters, having only managed to bring one or two pieces of clothing.
It is the rainy season in Cambodia and Thailand, and although the refugees are living in tents, heavy rain can still pour inside. Given the chaotic environment, and the mental and emotional distress, the risk of disease or sickness is high. Both governments need to act swiftly and implement emergency measures to assist the people living along the border.
Cambodia went through a tragic civil war brought about by the Khmer Rouge, making the border conflict all the more worrying, given the suffering that war brings to women and children. Every time a soldier dies in battle, a family is shattered — parents lose a son, children lose a father and wives are left to shoulder the burdens of financial support and caregiving.
A few days ago, a video of a soldier’s funeral showed his wife holding a baby in her arms, with two children aged three or four standing beside her. Thinking about how they would live from now on, I could not stop myself from crying.
War might help politicians gain power, but for ordinary people, it brings nothing but harm. The population is left to live in fear, pain and trauma. Such conflicts also damage the environment, destabilize society and stall economic development.
As a mother and a Cambodian, all I hope for is that people living along the border can have a safe and peaceful life, and that the people of both countries do not turn against each other. I urge both governments to stop the fighting, provide emergency aid to displaced people and offer continued support to the families of fallen soldiers.
Rumdul (a pseudonym) is an immigrant from Cambodia who has lived in Taiwan for more than 20 years.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
RSS