For more than six decades, India has been the lifeline of Tibetan culture, traditions and religious studies. Since the Dalai Lama’s exile in 1959, India has not only provided refuge to thousands of Tibetans, but has also played a crucial role in ensuring their cultural survival. Through dedicated settlements, educational institutions and religious centers, India has fostered an environment where Tibetan heritage thrives, despite Beijing’s relentless efforts to erase it.
India’s decision to welcome Tibetan refugees was not merely an act of humanitarianism — it was a commitment to preserving a civilization under threat. The establishment of Tibetan settlements across India, particularly in Dharamsala, Karnataka and Arunachal Pradesh, has allowed Tibetans to maintain their distinct identity while integrating into Indian society. These settlements have become self-sustaining communities, ensuring that Tibetan language, customs and traditions remain intact.
India has been instrumental in safeguarding Tibetan Buddhism, which faced severe repression in Tibet. Monasteries such as the Namgyal Monastery in Dharamsala, and the Sera, Drepung and Ganden monasteries in Karnataka have become centers of religious study, attracting academics and monks from around the world. The Indian government’s support for these institutions has ensured that Tibetan Buddhist teachings continue to flourish, despite Beijing’s attempts to Sinicize the faith.
Recognizing the importance of education in preserving Tibetan identity, India facilitated the establishment of Tibetan schools under the Central Tibetan Administration. The Tibetan Children’s Village and the Sambhota Tibetan Schools provide education in Tibetan language, history and culture, ensuring that younger generations remain connected to their heritage. These institutions have been vital in countering the forced assimilation policies imposed by China on Tibetan youth.
India’s role in preserving Tibetan culture is not just historical — it is ongoing. Despite geopolitical complexities, India continues to provide a platform for Tibetan voices, allowing exiled leaders and activists to advocate for their cause. The presence of the Dalai Lama in India has further bolstered this commitment, making the country a global center for Tibetan cultural and religious preservation.
India’s unwavering support has ensured that Tibetan identity remains resilient, even in exile. As Tibetans continue their struggle for autonomy, India’s role as a guardian of their heritage stands as a testament to the power of refuge, resilience and cultural revival.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament-in-exile.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to