China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.”
The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress.
After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization led to China’s imposition of drastic policies aimed at erasing Tibetan identity, such as the use of the Chinese word “Xizang” for Tibet. However, no matter how hard China politicizes the nomenclature of Tibet, facts cannot be forgotten. For example, the Indian government opted to use “Tibet” instead of “Xizang” in its statement extending condolences to the victims of the earthquake in January.
China’s core tactic for erasing Tibet is pressuring “subservient” nations to standardize views on the status of Tibet. The Nepalese prime minister’s joint statement with China read: “The Nepalese side reiterated that Xizang affairs are internal affairs of China, and that it will never allow any separatist activities against China on Nepal’s soil.”
Under China’s debt trap, the Nepalese government has no choice but to appease Chinese authorities when it comes to the issue of Tibet. Similarly, Bhutan did not hesitate to use Xizang for Tibet, as China’s constant aggression at the border leaves it in a difficult situation where accepting Beijing’s mandate comes as no surprise at all. China’s tactics — including using its economic power — attempt to pressure nations into distancing themselves from the three unpleasant ‘Ts’: Tibet, Taiwan and Tiananmen.
Today marks the 74th anniversary of the agreement that buried the independence of Tibet. This agreement was repudiated by the Dalai Lama in 1959 after eight years of trying to find common ground within the agreement’s framework. However, all points in the agreement were never meant to be implemented in Tibet.
The Dalai Lama in his book Voice for the Voiceless recounts an exchange with Mao Zedong (毛澤東) in 1954 about the Tibetan national flag: “One day, Chairman Mao paid an unannounced visit to my lodgings. During this meeting, he unexpectedly asked if Tibet had a national flag. Somewhat nervously, I replied that we did, and he said that it would be fine for us to keep it.”
This promise, made by Mao himself, has become completely illegal in Tibet, let alone granting Tibet genuine autonomy.
Yeshi Dawa is a former bureau chief at Radio Free Asia, Dharamshala, affiliated fellow at Tibet Policy Institute, anchor at Tibet TV and academic administrator at the Institute of Leadership & Governance, MSU Baroda.
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is
RSS