China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.”
The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress.
After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization led to China’s imposition of drastic policies aimed at erasing Tibetan identity, such as the use of the Chinese word “Xizang” for Tibet. However, no matter how hard China politicizes the nomenclature of Tibet, facts cannot be forgotten. For example, the Indian government opted to use “Tibet” instead of “Xizang” in its statement extending condolences to the victims of the earthquake in January.
China’s core tactic for erasing Tibet is pressuring “subservient” nations to standardize views on the status of Tibet. The Nepalese prime minister’s joint statement with China read: “The Nepalese side reiterated that Xizang affairs are internal affairs of China, and that it will never allow any separatist activities against China on Nepal’s soil.”
Under China’s debt trap, the Nepalese government has no choice but to appease Chinese authorities when it comes to the issue of Tibet. Similarly, Bhutan did not hesitate to use Xizang for Tibet, as China’s constant aggression at the border leaves it in a difficult situation where accepting Beijing’s mandate comes as no surprise at all. China’s tactics — including using its economic power — attempt to pressure nations into distancing themselves from the three unpleasant ‘Ts’: Tibet, Taiwan and Tiananmen.
Today marks the 74th anniversary of the agreement that buried the independence of Tibet. This agreement was repudiated by the Dalai Lama in 1959 after eight years of trying to find common ground within the agreement’s framework. However, all points in the agreement were never meant to be implemented in Tibet.
The Dalai Lama in his book Voice for the Voiceless recounts an exchange with Mao Zedong (毛澤東) in 1954 about the Tibetan national flag: “One day, Chairman Mao paid an unannounced visit to my lodgings. During this meeting, he unexpectedly asked if Tibet had a national flag. Somewhat nervously, I replied that we did, and he said that it would be fine for us to keep it.”
This promise, made by Mao himself, has become completely illegal in Tibet, let alone granting Tibet genuine autonomy.
Yeshi Dawa is a former bureau chief at Radio Free Asia, Dharamshala, affiliated fellow at Tibet Policy Institute, anchor at Tibet TV and academic administrator at the Institute of Leadership & Governance, MSU Baroda.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
Liberals have wasted no time in pointing to Karol Nawrocki’s lack of qualifications for his new job as president of Poland. He has never previously held political office. He won by the narrowest of margins, with 50.9 percent of the vote. However, Nawrocki possesses the one qualification that many national populists value above all other: a taste for physical strength laced with violence. Nawrocki is a former boxer who still likes to go a few rounds. He is also such an enthusiastic soccer supporter that he reportedly got the logos of his two favorite teams — Chelsea and Lechia Gdansk —
RSS