Seven months after French President Emmanuel Macron praised the success of Emily in Paris, but bemoaned the lack of homegrown European broadcasters and distributors on par with series creator Netflix Inc. Germany’s Friedrich Merz — whose road to becoming chancellor is proving rockier than expected — has made a similar proposal for “the establishment of a European media platform.”
European media platforms already exist, in a way: They are called Walt Disney Co, Apple Inc and Netflix. Their deep pockets and global reach have made them the go-to places for continental content from Emily in Paris to Banijay Group NV’s show Careme, about the great chef Antonin Careme.
With nascent European rivals struggling in the streaming wars — recent casualties include France’s Salto and Italy’s government-funded ITsART — politicians like Macron have been instead pushing US platforms to fund more local content.
If Merz is ready to heed Macron’s call for more ambitious action, it suggests that US President Donald Trump’s trade war has really raised the stakes — especially now with threats of 100 percent tariffs on films produced overseas.
Information is power and so is entertainment: Many Germans realized that when Elon Musk endorsed the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party and interviewed its head on X, where Musk has more followers than the population of France and Germany combined.
Now France is bracing for a direct attack on local-content rules as part of American arm-twisting over trade tariffs. If Europeans are serious about defending democratic and cultural values — and Merz’s government suggests they are — an Airbus of streaming might help.
What might such a project look like?
Macron and Merz cite the need to boost Franco-German broadcaster ARTE — launched by their predecessors Francois Mitterrand and Helmut Kohl. While usually associated with high-brow content like opera, the station has proven able to draw millions of views with heavy-metal concerts online. Beyond culture, the platform could also be a useful geopolitical hedge if tariff talks turn sour.
Yet there would also be value in using it to send a broader industry signal in favor of more consolidation. European broadcasters look like a collection of Asterix villages, fragmented along national borders and slow to adapt to technological disruption, yet competition regulators continue to show hostility to building champions. In 2022, Macron’s dream of a TF1-M6 merger to counter Big Tech was blocked, given that it would have controlled 70 percent of the national TV advertising market.
The flip side is that local companies’ spending on content in France has stayed at about 6.2 billion euros (US$7 billion) since 2016, while the US streaming giants have increased spending on top European markets 26-fold to 11.6 billion euros, according to Ampere Analysis.
Antitrust concerns will not go away overnight, yet geopolitics will add new impetus to shifting the debate or finding new ways to team up.
Media analyst Ian Whittaker points to RTL Group SA as one example: In 2024, the Luxembourg-based firm announced an advertising-technology partnership with ProSiebenSat.1 Media SE to make German advertising and the companies themselves less dependent on US tech. On the content side, recent deal activity includes the Berlusconi family’s MediaForEurope NV takeover offer for ProSiebenSat.1, valuing it at about 1.3 billion euros.
The real question, as in many industries from banking to defense, is just how committed Europeans themselves are to overcoming national borders.
Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Tom Ward still sees obstacles from regulation to language barriers and consumer tastes. There was a revealing moment in Macron’s comments to Variety magazine last year, when having called for a European Netflix, he promised to “fight hard” to keep Emily in Paris from moving to Rome.
The national interest dies hard: Even if artificial intelligence helps French viewers understand the Portuguese and vice versa, it will not suddenly unify different legal, regulatory or political systems that favor their own media moguls. America’s hegemonic power has been driven by having one currency, one national audience and one language — and one capital market willing to spread the Netflix wealth.
The odds are long, therefore, on a true Netflix slayer emerging from the trade war.
However, perhaps like the great auteurs of European cinema, maybe the opportunity comes from experimentation. That could include an Airbus-style project centered around ARTE and an encouragement of more private-sector partnerships. The democratic, cultural and corporate damage of sitting back and doing nothing could be big: In the 20 years since YouTube was launched, online advertising has ballooned 38-fold to become a US$722 billion market, while TV has grown about 25 percent. Emily may still be in Paris, but Macron is probably more excited about what Friedrich can bring.
Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist writing about the future of money and Europe. Previously, he was a reporter for Reuters and Forbes. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
RSS