The Central Election Commission (CEC) on Friday announced that recall motions targeting 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) have been approved, and that a recall vote would take place on July 26.
Of the recall motions against 35 KMT legislators, 31 were reviewed by the CEC after they exceeded the second-phase signature thresholds. Twenty-four were approved, five were asked to submit additional signatures to make up for invalid ones and two are still being reviewed.
The mass recall vote targeting so many lawmakers at once is unprecedented in Taiwan’s political history. If the KMT loses more than six seats and they are filled by the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) candidates in the by-election, the DPP would secure a majority and be able to reshape parliamentary decisions. However, if the KMT loses fewer than six, it might be emboldened to push through its agendas more aggressively, disregarding public opinion.
Of the total 113 legislative seats, the DPP holds 51, the KMT has 52, the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) holds eight and KMT-affiliated independents have two. The KMT and the TPP since last year have teamed up in the legislature, passing bills and cutting budgets in efforts to expand legislative power and weaken the executive power of President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration.
Many civic groups see the KMT-TPP partnership’s legislative decisions as a major threat to national development and security, as government budgets were arbitrarily cut and frozen, and defense and foreign policies are being hindered. Additionally, several KMT officials and legislators have met with Chinese officials without explanation, prompting people to suspect that China might be influencing their offensive against the government. As a result, the recall campaigns have also become a civic movement against pro-China politicians.
The KMT’s countermeasure of launching its own recalls all failed due to a lack of signatures and led to many of its local chapters’ personnel being indicted for allegedly forging signatures, including those of many deceased people. It also passed bills to increase national holidays and military personnel’s salaries in an attempt to win votes and fight back against what the KMT calls a “malicious recall driven by the DPP’s dictatorship.”
The KMT has not apologized for its unethical and problematic alleged forgery. Instead, it insists that it and the TPP are targets of the Lai administration’s “political persecution” and the judicial system is being manipulated to target them. Its latest attempt is trying to mislead the public into believing that the repeated signatures from the first phase and second phase petitions, which have been removed according to the law, could have been “forged” by civic groups, reinforcing its claim that the judicial system is unjust.
Some KMT legislators are also supporting the TPP’s proposal to abolish the Control Yuan, despite it being against their party’s charter, which upholds the five-branch Constitution, in hopes of winning votes from TPP supporters to save their seats.
Meanwhile, the DPP has fully supported the civic groups’ recall efforts. However, for the recalls to succeed, the number of “yes” votes must exceed one-quarter of the eligible voters in the constituency, as well as opposing votes, which remains a significant challenge. Voter turnout would be a crucial factor affecting the outcome.
As civic groups have been waiting for the CEC to give them the green light, they must keep up the momentum in the coming month, refining their arguments to attract neutral voters and carefully avoiding smear campaigns. The DPP must also maintain a delicate distance from the civic groups, supporting them, but not taking control, or it might risk spurring more “no” votes.
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is