The Central Election Commission (CEC) on Friday announced that recall motions targeting 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) have been approved, and that a recall vote would take place on July 26.
Of the recall motions against 35 KMT legislators, 31 were reviewed by the CEC after they exceeded the second-phase signature thresholds. Twenty-four were approved, five were asked to submit additional signatures to make up for invalid ones and two are still being reviewed.
The mass recall vote targeting so many lawmakers at once is unprecedented in Taiwan’s political history. If the KMT loses more than six seats and they are filled by the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) candidates in the by-election, the DPP would secure a majority and be able to reshape parliamentary decisions. However, if the KMT loses fewer than six, it might be emboldened to push through its agendas more aggressively, disregarding public opinion.
Of the total 113 legislative seats, the DPP holds 51, the KMT has 52, the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) holds eight and KMT-affiliated independents have two. The KMT and the TPP since last year have teamed up in the legislature, passing bills and cutting budgets in efforts to expand legislative power and weaken the executive power of President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration.
Many civic groups see the KMT-TPP partnership’s legislative decisions as a major threat to national development and security, as government budgets were arbitrarily cut and frozen, and defense and foreign policies are being hindered. Additionally, several KMT officials and legislators have met with Chinese officials without explanation, prompting people to suspect that China might be influencing their offensive against the government. As a result, the recall campaigns have also become a civic movement against pro-China politicians.
The KMT’s countermeasure of launching its own recalls all failed due to a lack of signatures and led to many of its local chapters’ personnel being indicted for allegedly forging signatures, including those of many deceased people. It also passed bills to increase national holidays and military personnel’s salaries in an attempt to win votes and fight back against what the KMT calls a “malicious recall driven by the DPP’s dictatorship.”
The KMT has not apologized for its unethical and problematic alleged forgery. Instead, it insists that it and the TPP are targets of the Lai administration’s “political persecution” and the judicial system is being manipulated to target them. Its latest attempt is trying to mislead the public into believing that the repeated signatures from the first phase and second phase petitions, which have been removed according to the law, could have been “forged” by civic groups, reinforcing its claim that the judicial system is unjust.
Some KMT legislators are also supporting the TPP’s proposal to abolish the Control Yuan, despite it being against their party’s charter, which upholds the five-branch Constitution, in hopes of winning votes from TPP supporters to save their seats.
Meanwhile, the DPP has fully supported the civic groups’ recall efforts. However, for the recalls to succeed, the number of “yes” votes must exceed one-quarter of the eligible voters in the constituency, as well as opposing votes, which remains a significant challenge. Voter turnout would be a crucial factor affecting the outcome.
As civic groups have been waiting for the CEC to give them the green light, they must keep up the momentum in the coming month, refining their arguments to attract neutral voters and carefully avoiding smear campaigns. The DPP must also maintain a delicate distance from the civic groups, supporting them, but not taking control, or it might risk spurring more “no” votes.
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
Taiwan last week finally reached a trade agreement with the US, reducing tariffs on Taiwanese goods to 15 percent, without stacking them on existing levies, from the 20 percent rate announced by US President Donald Trump’s administration in August last year. Taiwan also became the first country to secure most-favored-nation treatment for semiconductor and related suppliers under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act. In return, Taiwanese chipmakers, electronics manufacturing service providers and other technology companies would invest US$250 billion in the US, while the government would provide credit guarantees of up to US$250 billion to support Taiwanese firms
RSS