Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party?
While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold and recall votes are likely to be held next month and in August. The massive public discontent could lead to the KMT losing its majority in the legislature.
Chu likened “Operation Patriot” to a “Patriot” missile, saying “it aims to protect the country.” In reality, it is just an attempt to “protect KMT legislators,” with the party hoping to summon its supporters to help its lawmakers hold onto their seats. “Operation Patriot” comprises three steps: establishing local strategies in every jurisdiction, led by KMT mayors and commissioners; promoting regional mobilization by organizing a team of speakers, including Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) and KMT media personality Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), for cross-district reinforcement; and holding a national rally before the recall votes.
The recall motions against KMT lawmakers stem from public dissatisfaction with controversial legislation passed by the opposition-controlled legislature, such as unconstitutionally expanding the legislature’s power, cutting the national defense budget and blocking proposals to tighten national security. Some civic groups also call the massive recall campaign as a “battle against pro-China lawmakers who seek to sell out Taiwan.”
Garnering public support for its “patriots” is a huge challenge for the KMT, especially after visits this year to China by senior party leaders, including former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), and deputy chairmen Sean Lien (連勝文) and Andrew Hsia (夏立言), where they echoed Beijing’s “one China” principle. Those trips could give voters further impetus to recall pro-China legislators.
Chu’s “Operation Patriot” has also triggered doubts and mixed interpretations within the party. Media reports said that Chu unilaterally made the decision without consulting party dignitaries or local officials. His action was widely seen as an attempt to disperse the recall pressure and accountability of party leaders, and to further solidify his power amid a fight for the top post ahead of the KMT chairperson election in September.
Furthermore, Chu on Tuesday turned down President William Lai’s (賴清德) first-ever invitation to a national security affairs briefing for opposition leaders — despite his party repeatedly calling for the administration to hold dialogue with the opposition. His decision has made the KMT a follower of the smaller Taiwan People’s Party, which has consistently refused to communicate with the administration and had insisted on a live broadcast of the briefing, which would be national security risk.
The KMT’s and the TPP’s refusals are not only contrary to international practices of holding cross-party, closed-door security meetings to protect classified information, but also showed that they are only interested in political wrangling and prioritizing party interests over national security and interests.
With the recall votes likely starting next month, “real patriots” should be able to see past the opposition’s rhetoric and make the right choices to safeguard the nation.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS