Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party?
While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold and recall votes are likely to be held next month and in August. The massive public discontent could lead to the KMT losing its majority in the legislature.
Chu likened “Operation Patriot” to a “Patriot” missile, saying “it aims to protect the country.” In reality, it is just an attempt to “protect KMT legislators,” with the party hoping to summon its supporters to help its lawmakers hold onto their seats. “Operation Patriot” comprises three steps: establishing local strategies in every jurisdiction, led by KMT mayors and commissioners; promoting regional mobilization by organizing a team of speakers, including Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) and KMT media personality Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), for cross-district reinforcement; and holding a national rally before the recall votes.
The recall motions against KMT lawmakers stem from public dissatisfaction with controversial legislation passed by the opposition-controlled legislature, such as unconstitutionally expanding the legislature’s power, cutting the national defense budget and blocking proposals to tighten national security. Some civic groups also call the massive recall campaign as a “battle against pro-China lawmakers who seek to sell out Taiwan.”
Garnering public support for its “patriots” is a huge challenge for the KMT, especially after visits this year to China by senior party leaders, including former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), and deputy chairmen Sean Lien (連勝文) and Andrew Hsia (夏立言), where they echoed Beijing’s “one China” principle. Those trips could give voters further impetus to recall pro-China legislators.
Chu’s “Operation Patriot” has also triggered doubts and mixed interpretations within the party. Media reports said that Chu unilaterally made the decision without consulting party dignitaries or local officials. His action was widely seen as an attempt to disperse the recall pressure and accountability of party leaders, and to further solidify his power amid a fight for the top post ahead of the KMT chairperson election in September.
Furthermore, Chu on Tuesday turned down President William Lai’s (賴清德) first-ever invitation to a national security affairs briefing for opposition leaders — despite his party repeatedly calling for the administration to hold dialogue with the opposition. His decision has made the KMT a follower of the smaller Taiwan People’s Party, which has consistently refused to communicate with the administration and had insisted on a live broadcast of the briefing, which would be national security risk.
The KMT’s and the TPP’s refusals are not only contrary to international practices of holding cross-party, closed-door security meetings to protect classified information, but also showed that they are only interested in political wrangling and prioritizing party interests over national security and interests.
With the recall votes likely starting next month, “real patriots” should be able to see past the opposition’s rhetoric and make the right choices to safeguard the nation.
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework