The escalating global climate crisis has evolved into a challenge intertwining social equity, economic growth and international diplomacy.
Since the signing of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 1992, efforts have expanded beyond policy negotiations into broader social movements. Yet, despite decades of commitments, action remains inadequate.
Scientists warn that global temperatures could breach the 1.5°C threshold within seven years, jeopardizing the Paris Agreement’s ambitions. In this high-stakes context, young people have emerged as a dynamic force, redefining climate action with innovative, grassroots approaches.
Protest is often the entry point for climate action. Greta Thunberg’s Fridays for Future grew from a lone school strike in Sweden to a global movement pressuring governments. Extinction Rebellion Youth pushed the UK government to declare a climate emergency in 2019.
In Taiwan, students have protested university investments in polluting industries, scoring wins at top institutions.
However, protests can lose momentum without clear follow-through, as seen in the US Climate Strike Alliance, which struggled due to weak organization and resources. Still, when structured effectively, they ignite deeper engagement, as young Taiwanese have demonstrated by translating campus outrage into tangible policy shifts.
Advocacy bridges raw anger and actionable change. India’s Youth for Climate secured the Air Quality Improvement Act, while the African Youth Initiative on Climate Change trained young people to integrate renewable energy into underserved communities.
Taiwan’s Green Citizens’ Action Alliance (GCAA) exemplifies this shift — beyond marches, it has shaped energy policies, including rooftop solar initiatives and amendments to the Electricity Act (電業法), laying the groundwork for the nation’s renewable transition.
Resolution is where ideas solidify into policy or legislation. The Paris Agreement, though criticized for its reliance on voluntary targets, has driven domestic policies and corporate benchmarks.
However, political shifts pose risks. The US’ Green New Deal, championed by progressives under former US president Joe Biden, stalled due to partisan gridlock and was later dismantled under US President Donald Trump. This highlights a hard truth: Even when advocacy matures into policy, it remains vulnerable. Young people must navigate this landscape with strategy, not just zeal.
Taiwan’s young people face unique challenges. Excluded from formal UNFCCC participation, they have forged alternative pathways. The Taiwan Youth Climate Coalition (TWYCC), founded in 2009, trains young leaders through mock conference of the parties (COP) simulations and amplifies Taiwan’s voice at UN climate summits.
GCAA’s policy victories have accelerated Taiwan’s renewable energy shift, while groups like Our Island use documentaries to advance marine conservation efforts. The Taiwan Environmental Information Association and Citizen of the Earth foundation further enrich the nation’s environmental landscape.
However, lean budgets and diplomatic isolation limit their reach. TWYCC, for instance, attends COP as observers, not decisionmakers. Despite these hurdles, Taiwan’s young people employ digital diplomacy and regional alliances to maintain global engagement.
Across the world and in Taiwan, climate action thrives when protest, advocacy and resolution align, transforming grassroots momentum into lasting change. Young people bring fresh ideas and determination to a crisis they would outlive. Yet, co-optation remains a risk — politicians and vested interests can exploit their efforts.
Taiwan’s geopolitical constraints intensify this challenge, yet its youth persist, blending local achievements with global dialogue. As climate stakes rise their role is not just vital — it is a model for turning urgency into impact.
Jack Huang is a Taipei-based research fellow at the UN.
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS