Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the education system.
A class secretary at a school posted a photograph on social media that contained a notice from the school’s academic affairs office. That photo perfectly encapsulated the campus’ culture of falsification. The notice required that the class secretary focus on three items.
First, records for what students study as part of their flexible course content must not include core subjects, such as Chinese, English, mathematics, physics and social studies.
Second, exam papers for the courses cannot be referred to as tests, but must instead be called “assessments” or “reviews.”
Third, if an exam is arranged during the morning self-study period, teachers must deceive students by telling them it is only a “practice” exercise.
An angry face emoji was posted underneath the notice, with the class secretary saying: “Even the class secretary has to participate in the deception.”
That shows a serious issue in Taiwan’s education system. When education departments inspect schools, they only review written materials. Thus, to pass inspections, school administrations do not encourage teachers to instruct students in accordance with regulations. Instead, they teach students to falsify records to meet superficial requirements.
Flexible courses were designed to help students develop skill sets outside of core subjects, such as through life-oriented games, practicing self-expression, scientific readings and so on. However, they have been reduced to nothing but a tool to catch up on the curriculum. Schools condone this behavior, even providing guidance on how to avoid oversight by using misleading language.
That culture of cheating has a profound impact on students, teaching them that appearance is more important than substance. Such practices normalize deception and dishonesty, leading students to believe they will succeed as long as they do not get caught. That kind of activity ultimately destroys the foundation of integrity, turning schools into training grounds for dishonesty and fraud.
Once students leave school and start working, they would likely continue that pattern of thinking and behavior. If students learn to forge documents in school, they might even falsify financial reports or fabricate government data. It is a dangerous and slippery slope.
The forgeries in the KMT’s recall efforts could very well be an extension of that culture. When a person is taught from a young age that “getting by” takes priority over the truth, how can we expect them to become honest and principled adults?
The culture of academic dishonesty on school campuses and the forging of recall petition signatures are a reflection of the same social pathology. If the root cause is not addressed, Taiwan’s education system would continue to cultivate citizens who excel at playing word games rather than substantively solving problems, which would greatly undermine the foundation of integrity in society. Just as the disheartened arts and culture representative revealed, the problem already exists — what we need now is not a clever cover-up, but the courage to change.
Lin Cheng-wu is a junior-high school teacher.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS