Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the education system.
A class secretary at a school posted a photograph on social media that contained a notice from the school’s academic affairs office. That photo perfectly encapsulated the campus’ culture of falsification. The notice required that the class secretary focus on three items.
First, records for what students study as part of their flexible course content must not include core subjects, such as Chinese, English, mathematics, physics and social studies.
Second, exam papers for the courses cannot be referred to as tests, but must instead be called “assessments” or “reviews.”
Third, if an exam is arranged during the morning self-study period, teachers must deceive students by telling them it is only a “practice” exercise.
An angry face emoji was posted underneath the notice, with the class secretary saying: “Even the class secretary has to participate in the deception.”
That shows a serious issue in Taiwan’s education system. When education departments inspect schools, they only review written materials. Thus, to pass inspections, school administrations do not encourage teachers to instruct students in accordance with regulations. Instead, they teach students to falsify records to meet superficial requirements.
Flexible courses were designed to help students develop skill sets outside of core subjects, such as through life-oriented games, practicing self-expression, scientific readings and so on. However, they have been reduced to nothing but a tool to catch up on the curriculum. Schools condone this behavior, even providing guidance on how to avoid oversight by using misleading language.
That culture of cheating has a profound impact on students, teaching them that appearance is more important than substance. Such practices normalize deception and dishonesty, leading students to believe they will succeed as long as they do not get caught. That kind of activity ultimately destroys the foundation of integrity, turning schools into training grounds for dishonesty and fraud.
Once students leave school and start working, they would likely continue that pattern of thinking and behavior. If students learn to forge documents in school, they might even falsify financial reports or fabricate government data. It is a dangerous and slippery slope.
The forgeries in the KMT’s recall efforts could very well be an extension of that culture. When a person is taught from a young age that “getting by” takes priority over the truth, how can we expect them to become honest and principled adults?
The culture of academic dishonesty on school campuses and the forging of recall petition signatures are a reflection of the same social pathology. If the root cause is not addressed, Taiwan’s education system would continue to cultivate citizens who excel at playing word games rather than substantively solving problems, which would greatly undermine the foundation of integrity in society. Just as the disheartened arts and culture representative revealed, the problem already exists — what we need now is not a clever cover-up, but the courage to change.
Lin Cheng-wu is a junior-high school teacher.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
A recent scandal involving a high-school student from a private school in Taichung has reignited long-standing frustrations with Taiwan’s increasingly complex and high-pressure university admissions system. The student, who had successfully gained admission to several prestigious medical schools, shared their learning portfolio on social media — only for Internet sleuths to quickly uncover a falsified claim of receiving a “Best Debater” award. The fallout was swift and unforgiving. National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University and Taipei Medical University revoked the student’s admission on Wednesday. One day later, Chung Shan Medical University also announced it would cancel the student’s admission. China Medical
Construction of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County’s Hengchun Township (恆春) started in 1978. It began commercial operations in 1984. Since then, it has experienced several accidents, radiation pollution and fires. It was finally decommissioned on May 17 after the operating license of its No. 2 reactor expired. However, a proposed referendum to be held on Aug. 23 on restarting the reactor is potentially bringing back those risks. Four reasons are listed for holding the referendum: First, the difficulty of meeting greenhouse gas reduction targets and the inefficiency of new energy sources such as photovoltaic and wind power. Second,
RSS