Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the education system.
A class secretary at a school posted a photograph on social media that contained a notice from the school’s academic affairs office. That photo perfectly encapsulated the campus’ culture of falsification. The notice required that the class secretary focus on three items.
First, records for what students study as part of their flexible course content must not include core subjects, such as Chinese, English, mathematics, physics and social studies.
Second, exam papers for the courses cannot be referred to as tests, but must instead be called “assessments” or “reviews.”
Third, if an exam is arranged during the morning self-study period, teachers must deceive students by telling them it is only a “practice” exercise.
An angry face emoji was posted underneath the notice, with the class secretary saying: “Even the class secretary has to participate in the deception.”
That shows a serious issue in Taiwan’s education system. When education departments inspect schools, they only review written materials. Thus, to pass inspections, school administrations do not encourage teachers to instruct students in accordance with regulations. Instead, they teach students to falsify records to meet superficial requirements.
Flexible courses were designed to help students develop skill sets outside of core subjects, such as through life-oriented games, practicing self-expression, scientific readings and so on. However, they have been reduced to nothing but a tool to catch up on the curriculum. Schools condone this behavior, even providing guidance on how to avoid oversight by using misleading language.
That culture of cheating has a profound impact on students, teaching them that appearance is more important than substance. Such practices normalize deception and dishonesty, leading students to believe they will succeed as long as they do not get caught. That kind of activity ultimately destroys the foundation of integrity, turning schools into training grounds for dishonesty and fraud.
Once students leave school and start working, they would likely continue that pattern of thinking and behavior. If students learn to forge documents in school, they might even falsify financial reports or fabricate government data. It is a dangerous and slippery slope.
The forgeries in the KMT’s recall efforts could very well be an extension of that culture. When a person is taught from a young age that “getting by” takes priority over the truth, how can we expect them to become honest and principled adults?
The culture of academic dishonesty on school campuses and the forging of recall petition signatures are a reflection of the same social pathology. If the root cause is not addressed, Taiwan’s education system would continue to cultivate citizens who excel at playing word games rather than substantively solving problems, which would greatly undermine the foundation of integrity in society. Just as the disheartened arts and culture representative revealed, the problem already exists — what we need now is not a clever cover-up, but the courage to change.
Lin Cheng-wu is a junior-high school teacher.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS