On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics.
He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to a euphemism for communist sympathizers.
The former president should clarify a few matters, because he seemed to be saying that Taiwan’s democracy has been transformed into an echo chamber, that the government is not tolerant of different ideological viewpoints and that there is no diversity of political opinions.
He suggested that President William Lai (賴清德) is a dictator and that the country’s highest court has become a tool for the administration.
He also seemed to be saying that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) was merely expressing a difference of opinion when he headed a group of 16 KMT legislators to Beijing last year to meet with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials. He dismissed accusations that Fu and the KMT lawmakers were CCP messengers or their running dogs. If not, then what exactly was he implying?
The current administration is being hamstrung and the legislature thrown into chaos by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). The defense of these malicious parties is half-baked and unclear.
With such an attitude toward current affairs, what does Chen think people should do? His speech had more than the whiff of gaslighting about it.
Why did Chen remain silent while the KMT and TPP worked together to expand their legislative powers and trample on the Constitution last year and earlier this year? Why did he not speak up when they were slashing the national budget and throwing the legislature into chaos.
Chen has previously claimed that he was persecuted for political reasons and wrongfully accused of corruption. How then is he conflating his situation with that of former TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who has been charged with profiteering and contravening campaign finance laws? Surely Chen is not recanting his claims of innocence.
History provides a record not only of the choices people make, but also who stayed silent. As the KMT and TPP continue collaborating to wreck the nation, and Fu dutifully follows mandates from the CCP, which seeks to destabilize Taiwan’s free and democratic system, Chen chooses to speak ambiguously to the CCP’s “united front” tactics and infiltration efforts.
If he truly wanted to safeguard Taiwan’s democracy and freedoms, he should speak plainly, clearly and resolutely.
Ten Len-phone is a retired radio program host.
Translated by Tim Smith
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
RSS