On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics.
He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to a euphemism for communist sympathizers.
The former president should clarify a few matters, because he seemed to be saying that Taiwan’s democracy has been transformed into an echo chamber, that the government is not tolerant of different ideological viewpoints and that there is no diversity of political opinions.
He suggested that President William Lai (賴清德) is a dictator and that the country’s highest court has become a tool for the administration.
He also seemed to be saying that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) was merely expressing a difference of opinion when he headed a group of 16 KMT legislators to Beijing last year to meet with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials. He dismissed accusations that Fu and the KMT lawmakers were CCP messengers or their running dogs. If not, then what exactly was he implying?
The current administration is being hamstrung and the legislature thrown into chaos by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). The defense of these malicious parties is half-baked and unclear.
With such an attitude toward current affairs, what does Chen think people should do? His speech had more than the whiff of gaslighting about it.
Why did Chen remain silent while the KMT and TPP worked together to expand their legislative powers and trample on the Constitution last year and earlier this year? Why did he not speak up when they were slashing the national budget and throwing the legislature into chaos.
Chen has previously claimed that he was persecuted for political reasons and wrongfully accused of corruption. How then is he conflating his situation with that of former TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who has been charged with profiteering and contravening campaign finance laws? Surely Chen is not recanting his claims of innocence.
History provides a record not only of the choices people make, but also who stayed silent. As the KMT and TPP continue collaborating to wreck the nation, and Fu dutifully follows mandates from the CCP, which seeks to destabilize Taiwan’s free and democratic system, Chen chooses to speak ambiguously to the CCP’s “united front” tactics and infiltration efforts.
If he truly wanted to safeguard Taiwan’s democracy and freedoms, he should speak plainly, clearly and resolutely.
Ten Len-phone is a retired radio program host.
Translated by Tim Smith
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
There is an old saying that if there is blood in the water, the sharks will come. In Taiwan’s case, that shark is China, circling, waiting for any sign of weakness to strike. Many thought the failed recall effort was that blood in the water, a signal for Beijing to press harder, but Taiwan’s democracy has just proven that China is mistaken. The recent recall campaign against 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, many with openly pro-Beijing leanings, failed at the ballot box. While the challenge targeted opposition lawmakers rather than President William Lai (賴清德) himself, it became an indirect
A recent critique of former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s speech in Taiwan (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” by Sasha B. Chhabra, Aug. 12, page 8) seriously misinterpreted his remarks, twisting them to fit a preconceived narrative. As a Taiwanese who witnessed his political rise and fall firsthand while living in the UK and was present for his speech in Taipei, I have a unique vantage point from which to say I think the critiques of his visit deliberately misinterpreted his words. By dwelling on his personal controversies, they obscured the real substance of his message. A clarification is needed to
RSS