The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators.
President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities.
Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force, those who traveled to an enemy country to secretly meet with officials engaged in “united front” operations against Taiwan should face legal consequences.
Backed by the CCP, the pro-unification camp has launched an assault on the nation, aiming to paralyze the government. They claim to fight dictatorship, yet openly embrace dictators.
The KMT and TPP have provided “mutual legal assistance” by expressing support for corruption and document forgery, shamelessly gathering to pressure and threaten the judiciary.
They opened a back door for the CCP within the legislature — yet they accuse the anti-CCP pan-green camp of being “green communists.”
The KMT ruled Taiwan under martial law for nearly half a century, yet today the party’s elites travel to China and court CCP officials.
Meanwhile, some of their party members and staffers are facing legal consequences for allegedly forging signatures from deceased people in recall petitions targeting their political rivals, yet they shamelessly vow to “fight against dictatorship.”
Does the judiciary owe preferential treatment to the KMT and the TPP?
KMT Taipei chapter secretary Yao Fu-wen (姚富文) and secretary-general Chu Wen-ching (初文卿) have denied any wrongdoing, saying they obtained the petition documents from the KMT Youth League, but how could the Youth League have accessed the party’s register of members?
Last year, the KMT and the TPP jointly pushed through amendments to the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法), tightening the requirements for petitions used to initiate the recall of elected officials.
The amended law included harsher penalties, stipulating that anyone found guilty of using another person’s identification or forging documents for a recall petition could face up to five years in prison or a fine of up to NT$1 million (US$30,745). They are protesting the legal consequences of contravening the very law they helped create.
They not only refused to admit their wrongdoing, but also surrounded the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office.
Nearly 95 percent of the petitions submitted by civil groups leading recall campaigns targeting KMT lawmakers comply with regulations, while 40 percent of the KMT’s recall petitions against Democratic Progressive Party lawmakers have contravened the rules, strongly indicating systematic document forgery.
Politicians tied to a scam syndicate stood on Ketagalan Boulevard in an attempt to deceive the public, insult the president, incite hatred against the government and create confrontation.
This mass recall campaign amounts to a civil war on democracy and culture. If Taiwan can get through the transition period, the country would see 100 years of prosperity.
Taiwanese must not tolerate or turn a blind eye to the opposition parties’ vicious acts. They should come forward and recall these lawmakers.
Chu Meng-hsiang is a former deputy secretary-general of the Lee Teng-hui Foundation.
Translated by Fion Khan
Chinese actor Alan Yu (于朦朧) died after allegedly falling from a building in Beijing on Sept. 11. The actor’s mysterious death was tightly censored on Chinese social media, with discussions and doubts about the incident quickly erased. Even Hong Kong artist Daniel Chan’s (陳曉東) post questioning the truth about the case was automatically deleted, sparking concern among overseas Chinese-speaking communities about the dark culture and severe censorship in China’s entertainment industry. Yu had been under house arrest for days, and forced to drink with the rich and powerful before he died, reports said. He lost his life in this vicious
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
In South Korea, the medical cosmetic industry is fiercely competitive and prices are low, attracting beauty enthusiasts from Taiwan. However, basic medical risks are often overlooked. While sharing a meal with friends recently, I heard one mention that his daughter would be going to South Korea for a cosmetic skincare procedure. I felt a twinge of unease at the time, but seeing as it was just a casual conversation among friends, I simply reminded him to prioritize safety. I never thought that, not long after, I would actually encounter a patient in my clinic with a similar situation. She had
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
RSS