The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators.
President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities.
Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force, those who traveled to an enemy country to secretly meet with officials engaged in “united front” operations against Taiwan should face legal consequences.
Backed by the CCP, the pro-unification camp has launched an assault on the nation, aiming to paralyze the government. They claim to fight dictatorship, yet openly embrace dictators.
The KMT and TPP have provided “mutual legal assistance” by expressing support for corruption and document forgery, shamelessly gathering to pressure and threaten the judiciary.
They opened a back door for the CCP within the legislature — yet they accuse the anti-CCP pan-green camp of being “green communists.”
The KMT ruled Taiwan under martial law for nearly half a century, yet today the party’s elites travel to China and court CCP officials.
Meanwhile, some of their party members and staffers are facing legal consequences for allegedly forging signatures from deceased people in recall petitions targeting their political rivals, yet they shamelessly vow to “fight against dictatorship.”
Does the judiciary owe preferential treatment to the KMT and the TPP?
KMT Taipei chapter secretary Yao Fu-wen (姚富文) and secretary-general Chu Wen-ching (初文卿) have denied any wrongdoing, saying they obtained the petition documents from the KMT Youth League, but how could the Youth League have accessed the party’s register of members?
Last year, the KMT and the TPP jointly pushed through amendments to the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法), tightening the requirements for petitions used to initiate the recall of elected officials.
The amended law included harsher penalties, stipulating that anyone found guilty of using another person’s identification or forging documents for a recall petition could face up to five years in prison or a fine of up to NT$1 million (US$30,745). They are protesting the legal consequences of contravening the very law they helped create.
They not only refused to admit their wrongdoing, but also surrounded the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office.
Nearly 95 percent of the petitions submitted by civil groups leading recall campaigns targeting KMT lawmakers comply with regulations, while 40 percent of the KMT’s recall petitions against Democratic Progressive Party lawmakers have contravened the rules, strongly indicating systematic document forgery.
Politicians tied to a scam syndicate stood on Ketagalan Boulevard in an attempt to deceive the public, insult the president, incite hatred against the government and create confrontation.
This mass recall campaign amounts to a civil war on democracy and culture. If Taiwan can get through the transition period, the country would see 100 years of prosperity.
Taiwanese must not tolerate or turn a blind eye to the opposition parties’ vicious acts. They should come forward and recall these lawmakers.
Chu Meng-hsiang is a former deputy secretary-general of the Lee Teng-hui Foundation.
Translated by Fion Khan
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
RSS