Chinese actor Alan Yu (于朦朧) died after allegedly falling from a building in Beijing on Sept. 11. The actor’s mysterious death was tightly censored on Chinese social media, with discussions and doubts about the incident quickly erased. Even Hong Kong artist Daniel Chan’s (陳曉東) post questioning the truth about the case was automatically deleted, sparking concern among overseas Chinese-speaking communities about the dark culture and severe censorship in China’s entertainment industry.
Yu had been under house arrest for days, and forced to drink with the rich and powerful before he died, reports said. He lost his life in this vicious environment of politics-business collusion. This kind of qianguize (潛規則), or hidden rules, that are devoid of humanity not only kill individual lives, but also strangle freedom of speech in Chinese society.
As a society with diverse voices, the rule of law and respect for human rights, Taiwan is a contrast to China in many ways, and the gap can hardly be concealed by Beijing’s political slogans.
The Chinese entertainment industry appears glamorous, with stars shining on red carpets and fans cheering on social media, but this is only on the surface. The truth is that stars’ successes often stem not from talent, but from manipulation by capital and power.
Those resisting the hidden rules might be canceled, excluded — as can be seen in Yu’s tragedy.
The experience of Golden Horse Award Best Actor winner Wu Kang-ren’s (吳慷仁) attempt to expand his career in China also exposed obstacles in the Chinese entertainment industry. Wu faced a boycott from Chinese Internet users due to the political atmosphere and hidden rules. Plus, his collaboration with costar Betty Sun (孫儷) was obstructed last year when she questioned his political stance and threatened to withdraw from the TV drama they were starring in. Ultimately, he returned to Taiwan to rebuild his career.
Wu’s example reveals that under an authoritarian system where freedom of speech and creation are absent, even outstanding artists struggle to thrive. As political censorship and the hidden rules closely interweave with each other in the Chinese entertainment sector, they have mercilessly oppressed people’s humanity and creative expression. This is a sorrow not only for artists, but also for the entire system.
From Yu’s tragedy to Wu’s failure, instead of a shared culture on the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, only a deep-rooted institutional gap and conflicting values are evident. Under China’s censorship and omnipresent monitoring, entertainers can hardly speak out and are forced to “help the wicked perpetuate wicked deeds,” while a fair and transparent investigation into Yu’s death is not possible.
The situation is a reminder that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait should not get closer blindly. Rather, Taiwanese should face their differences from China in freedom, the rule of law and human rights, while safeguarding the nation’s precious democratic values.
Taiwanese should stay alert to the hidden rules and dark forces that are devoid of humanity in China’s entertainment world as well as overall societal system. They should also reflect on the duplicity of and the risks behind the concept of “two sides of the Strait are one family” (兩岸一家親). Only by staying vigilant and having a clear awareness can Taiwan keep its democracy and freedom, and be sure that its values would not be compromised.
Yang Chih-chiang is an elementary-school teacher.
Translated by Eddy Chang
There is a modern roadway stretching from central Hargeisa, the capital of Somaliland in the Horn of Africa, to the partially recognized state’s Egal International Airport. Emblazoned on a gold plaque marking the road’s inauguration in July last year, just below the flags of Somaliland and the Republic of China (ROC), is the road’s official name: “Taiwan Avenue.” The first phase of construction of the upgraded road, with new sidewalks and a modern drainage system to reduce flooding, was 70 percent funded by Taipei, which contributed US$1.85 million. That is a relatively modest sum for the effect on international perception, and
At the end of last year, a diplomatic development with consequences reaching well beyond the regional level emerged. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared Israel’s recognition of Somaliland as a sovereign state, paving the way for political, economic and strategic cooperation with the African nation. The diplomatic breakthrough yields, above all, substantial and tangible benefits for the two countries, enhancing Somaliland’s international posture, with a state prepared to champion its bid for broader legitimacy. With Israel’s support, Somaliland might also benefit from the expertise of Israeli companies in fields such as mineral exploration and water management, as underscored by Israeli Minister of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,