An altercation involving a 73-year-old woman and a younger person broke out on a Taipei MRT train last week, with videos of the incident going viral online, sparking wide discussions about the controversial priority seats and social norms.
In the video, the elderly woman, surnamed Tseng (曾), approached a passenger in a priority seat and demanded that she get up, and after she refused, she swung her bag, hitting her on the knees and calves several times. In return, the commuter asked a nearby passenger to hold her bag, stood up and kicked Tseng, causing her to fall backward and land in an empty seat on the other side of the carriage.
Taipei Rapid Transit Corp said neither party pressed charges related to the incident, but Tseng was arrested outside a convenience store the next day after a disturbance inside. Local media reported that Tseng had previously been arrested and convicted for shoplifting, sentenced in June to 55 days in prison, but failed to report to prison, so a warrant was issued for her arrest.
Tseng was described as a “repeat offender” who had allegedly forced younger women, including pregnant women, to get out of priority seats so she could sit.
The Taipei Police Department’s Rapid Transit Division summoned both people following the altercation, and they could each face a fine of up to NT$18,000.
People have expressed a variety of opinions on the incident, with some supporting the young woman and calling it a “kick of justice,” saying that she was only acting in self-defense, while some criticized her use of violence against an elderly person, who could have been seriously injured.
Others said that it is not about generational conflict or lack of compassion, but about how people are used to enduring mild harassments to preserve harmony, with many cheering for the younger passenger because she took action to stop a repeat offender who often bullies young women just because she believes they would more likely bend under harassment.
With altercations over priority seats on public transportation occurring for years, the Legislative Yuan in July passed amendments to change the term from “courtesy seats” (博愛座) to “priority seats” (優先席), to highlight inclusion — urging passengers to not only yield the seats to the elderly, the disabled, pregnant women and children, but to anyone in need.
However, the case last week showed that changing the name has not changed some people’s long-held views. With the proportions of elderly people in the population continuing to grow, confrontations might continue if some elderly citizens believe their age makes them more worthy of the priority seats.
There have been suggestions that the government explicitly list the order of priority for sitting in the seats to avoid confusion. Another approach might be to change the MRT priority seats to the same color as the others, softening the rigid lines that highlight differences over inclusiveness.
The long-term solutions obviously include cultivating understanding, respect and consideration for others, regardless of gender or age differences, while people should also be encouraged to take legal action, instead of vigilante justice, against harassment and threats to their personal safety, which should all be emphasized at home and in education from a young age.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS