An altercation involving a 73-year-old woman and a younger person broke out on a Taipei MRT train last week, with videos of the incident going viral online, sparking wide discussions about the controversial priority seats and social norms.
In the video, the elderly woman, surnamed Tseng (曾), approached a passenger in a priority seat and demanded that she get up, and after she refused, she swung her bag, hitting her on the knees and calves several times. In return, the commuter asked a nearby passenger to hold her bag, stood up and kicked Tseng, causing her to fall backward and land in an empty seat on the other side of the carriage.
Taipei Rapid Transit Corp said neither party pressed charges related to the incident, but Tseng was arrested outside a convenience store the next day after a disturbance inside. Local media reported that Tseng had previously been arrested and convicted for shoplifting, sentenced in June to 55 days in prison, but failed to report to prison, so a warrant was issued for her arrest.
Tseng was described as a “repeat offender” who had allegedly forced younger women, including pregnant women, to get out of priority seats so she could sit.
The Taipei Police Department’s Rapid Transit Division summoned both people following the altercation, and they could each face a fine of up to NT$18,000.
People have expressed a variety of opinions on the incident, with some supporting the young woman and calling it a “kick of justice,” saying that she was only acting in self-defense, while some criticized her use of violence against an elderly person, who could have been seriously injured.
Others said that it is not about generational conflict or lack of compassion, but about how people are used to enduring mild harassments to preserve harmony, with many cheering for the younger passenger because she took action to stop a repeat offender who often bullies young women just because she believes they would more likely bend under harassment.
With altercations over priority seats on public transportation occurring for years, the Legislative Yuan in July passed amendments to change the term from “courtesy seats” (博愛座) to “priority seats” (優先席), to highlight inclusion — urging passengers to not only yield the seats to the elderly, the disabled, pregnant women and children, but to anyone in need.
However, the case last week showed that changing the name has not changed some people’s long-held views. With the proportions of elderly people in the population continuing to grow, confrontations might continue if some elderly citizens believe their age makes them more worthy of the priority seats.
There have been suggestions that the government explicitly list the order of priority for sitting in the seats to avoid confusion. Another approach might be to change the MRT priority seats to the same color as the others, softening the rigid lines that highlight differences over inclusiveness.
The long-term solutions obviously include cultivating understanding, respect and consideration for others, regardless of gender or age differences, while people should also be encouraged to take legal action, instead of vigilante justice, against harassment and threats to their personal safety, which should all be emphasized at home and in education from a young age.
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS