As expected, US President Donald Trump has once again withdrawn the US from the Paris climate agreement.
Unlike in 2017, everyone saw this one coming — Trump’s commitment to fracking and ignorance of global integration has been broadcast for a long time.
However, other countries that remain part of the agreement still need to develop a way forward. The US departure is a big loss to collective global efforts to reduce global warming, and its former influential position in the agreement means the climate regime might no longer have a leading driver.
States could use two ways to face this situation. First, they could simply replace the driver.
As climate change is complex, cross-national cooperation would always be necessary. China and the EU, given their leading position in renewable energy potential and international stature, could take over the driver’s seat.
Another option is what Taiwan has implemented, known as the “polycentric” strategy, which is to reduce reliance on a single integrated climate regime system, such as the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC), commonly known as the “COP,” and the Paris Agreement.
Other levels of transnational governance — including regional groups, financial market mechanisms, bilateral approaches and even subnational cooperation — could also have a similar impact in helping states develop a strong climate policy framework.
Diplomatic isolation means UNFCCC has not been an option for Taiwan for a long time.
Taiwan is still adopting several Paris Agreement frameworks into its policies, including The National Climate Change Action Guidelines released in 2023.
However, external pressures and diplomatic isolation has necessitated the nation’s climate diplomacy be more creative, diverse and independent.
This has empowered multiple actors such as subnational governments, enterprises and even the civil society organizations to get involved in the transnational real. This is a polycentric strategy at its finest.
Between 2010 and 2022, South Korea reduced its greenhouse gas emissions by 4 percent, while Taiwan reduced them by about 2 percent, data compiled by the International Energy Agency have showed.
Fossil fuels make up 51 percent of South Korea’s energy mix, while for Taiwan it is 35 percent. In addition, both countries have also similar pledges to fulfill net zero emission by 2050.
Jan Petzold, a climate researcher at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany, said that a polycentric strategy could be effective if it ensures inclusivity and interlinkages, and drives innovation while harnessing local strengths.
Taiwan has set the formula by becoming a prime example in doing all of them.
First, it has interlinkages of multiple actors, which is backed by its high-level of democracy. In climate policy, adaptation requires not just high participation from multiple actors at different levels, but also ensuring all of them know what their roles are.
Policy guidelines in Taiwan have done that — with multiple actors acknowledging that cooperation between the government, private enterprises and non-governmental organizations is important.
This includes the government serving as the planner and helping with financing alongside the private sector, while also delegating coordination responsibilities to civil society organizations.
On another level, academia plays a role in raising awareness and monitoring implementations.
The government is also aware of its local industrial profile and stimulates innovation in according with certain priorities.
For example, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) recognized Taiwan’s climate vulnerability, such as nuclear energy generating one-fifth of the nation’s power supply.
Therefore, the government set a plan to remove nuclear power and gradually increase the supply of renewable energy as part of the “nuclear-free homeland” by this year.
The government has also recognized Taiwan’s significant potential for offshore wind energy, with multiple wind energy subsidy programs being introduced.
President William Lai (賴清德) has shown similar aspirations, such as by announcing his commitment to reducing Taiwan’s dependence on fossil fuels and calling for Taiwan to harness its proficiency in artificial intelligence to transition to a net zero economy, such as through developing a smart grid.
Despite its diplomatic isolation, empowerment of multiple actors in transnational activities has made the nation catch-up with global climate frameworks.
Taiwan shows how inclusivity, democracy, interlinkages and innovation are important for developing a climate mitigation framework.
Other countries could construct their own polycentric strategy so they can also thrive in an era of uncertain global climate governance.
Muhammad Raka Hadiyan is an international relations researcher studying at Universitas Airlangga in Indonesia. He is also a Taiwan Experience Education Program intern at National Kaohsiung Normal University, and a former exchange student at National Taiwan University.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS