The grassroots movement pushing for a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators from multiple constituencies is catching fire across the nation. On top of this, it was recently revealed that KMT Legislator Lee Yen-hsiu (李彥秀) — who is on the recall list for Taipei lawmakers, alongside her colleagues Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) and Wang Hung-wei (王鴻薇) — owns properties in an upscale residential area in Irvine, California, and the resort city of Sanya on China’s Hainan island that are worth hundreds of millions of New Taiwan dollars. If the reports are correct, the market value of her California mansion alone could be as high as NT$2.1 billion (US$63.97 million).
Lee said that she purchased the property in Irvine in 2016 for US$1.8 million — about NT$59.09 million at the current exchange rate — not NT$2.1 billion as former Democratic Progressive Party legislator Kao Chia-yu (高嘉瑜) claimed. The property consists of a house with a floor area of 5,142ft2 (478m2) that sits on a 6,900ft2 plot of land.
According to Lee, her office staff made a mistake when filing her assets declaration form by failing to convert square feet into square meters, thus causing a misunderstanding.
Kao asked: “So, that is to say that as soon as Lee took office, she hurriedly transferred a large amount of funds to purchase a property in the US. She also spends extended amounts of time in the US each year. Could it be that she is planning to immigrate to the US as an investor? Does she have a green card?”
All of these factors, if true, are likely to worsen voters’ resentment of Lee, increasing the likelihood of a recall.
After all, since the start of the legislative session last year, the KMT has been shamelessly pro-China, anti-Taiwan and suspicious of the US. In November, Donald Trump won the US presidential election and nominated the pro-Taiwan US senator Marco Rubio as secretary of state. Despite this, Lee said Taiwan should not be overly optimistic when the first agreement under the US-Taiwan Initiative on 21st Century Trade came into force in December. From this, Lee’s intent to sow distrust between the US and Taiwan is clear.
Although Lee has been revealed to own a mansion in the US, she has yet to clarify just how much the property is worth, nor has she responded to questions about investment immigration or owning a green card. If even a KMT legislator behaves this way, just how many other KMT members are like her — publicly raising suspicions about the US, while privately investing huge sums into the US? Saying one thing, but doing another, how can voters not be disillusioned by this behavior?
All Taiwanese must recognize that KMT legislators are only interested in reaping benefits from the US and Taiwan — they have no intention of taking any risks or responsibility. So long as they possess power, they will act to maximize their advantage. However, once things start to go awry, they will simply walk away — such is their shameless and despicable nature. We must not allow them to continue to hold political power. We must actively stand up to recall corrupt, two-faced politicians like Lee. Only those politicians who prioritize Taiwan should be given the honor of serving the public.
John Yu is a civil servant in Taipei.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective