The grassroots movement pushing for a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators from multiple constituencies is catching fire across the nation. On top of this, it was recently revealed that KMT Legislator Lee Yen-hsiu (李彥秀) — who is on the recall list for Taipei lawmakers, alongside her colleagues Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) and Wang Hung-wei (王鴻薇) — owns properties in an upscale residential area in Irvine, California, and the resort city of Sanya on China’s Hainan island that are worth hundreds of millions of New Taiwan dollars. If the reports are correct, the market value of her California mansion alone could be as high as NT$2.1 billion (US$63.97 million).
Lee said that she purchased the property in Irvine in 2016 for US$1.8 million — about NT$59.09 million at the current exchange rate — not NT$2.1 billion as former Democratic Progressive Party legislator Kao Chia-yu (高嘉瑜) claimed. The property consists of a house with a floor area of 5,142ft2 (478m2) that sits on a 6,900ft2 plot of land.
According to Lee, her office staff made a mistake when filing her assets declaration form by failing to convert square feet into square meters, thus causing a misunderstanding.
Kao asked: “So, that is to say that as soon as Lee took office, she hurriedly transferred a large amount of funds to purchase a property in the US. She also spends extended amounts of time in the US each year. Could it be that she is planning to immigrate to the US as an investor? Does she have a green card?”
All of these factors, if true, are likely to worsen voters’ resentment of Lee, increasing the likelihood of a recall.
After all, since the start of the legislative session last year, the KMT has been shamelessly pro-China, anti-Taiwan and suspicious of the US. In November, Donald Trump won the US presidential election and nominated the pro-Taiwan US senator Marco Rubio as secretary of state. Despite this, Lee said Taiwan should not be overly optimistic when the first agreement under the US-Taiwan Initiative on 21st Century Trade came into force in December. From this, Lee’s intent to sow distrust between the US and Taiwan is clear.
Although Lee has been revealed to own a mansion in the US, she has yet to clarify just how much the property is worth, nor has she responded to questions about investment immigration or owning a green card. If even a KMT legislator behaves this way, just how many other KMT members are like her — publicly raising suspicions about the US, while privately investing huge sums into the US? Saying one thing, but doing another, how can voters not be disillusioned by this behavior?
All Taiwanese must recognize that KMT legislators are only interested in reaping benefits from the US and Taiwan — they have no intention of taking any risks or responsibility. So long as they possess power, they will act to maximize their advantage. However, once things start to go awry, they will simply walk away — such is their shameless and despicable nature. We must not allow them to continue to hold political power. We must actively stand up to recall corrupt, two-faced politicians like Lee. Only those politicians who prioritize Taiwan should be given the honor of serving the public.
John Yu is a civil servant in Taipei.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS