In 1624, Taiwan became embroiled in the Age of Sail competition between Dutch and Spanish colonial powers. During the rule of the Chinese Ming Dynasty loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功), also known as Koxinga, and the subsequent rule by the Manchu-led Qing Dynasty, Han Chinese culture was introduced to Taiwan. Later in the Japanese colonial rule, Japanese culture was also imported. Together, the historical traces of the past colonization, together with its inheritance of Austronesian culture, have enriched the cultural landscape of Taiwan.
With that diverse culture, Taiwan has become inclusive through respect and tolerance. The early democratic efforts by the Taiwan Cultural Association and the Petition Movement for the Establishment of a Taiwanese Parliament laid a foundation for freedom and democracy, eventually leading to a free and democratic Taiwan.
China has followed a different path, forming an authoritarian and dictatorial system through its national ideology and institutional structures. Taiwan’s ethnic minorities should not be misled by the efforts of collaborators in Beijing’s all-encompassing “united front” work to only recognize “Chinese culture,” which is an attempt to weaken Taiwan’s culture and identity.
Given its essential majority in the legislature, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers recently recommended seven academics, who are mostly pro-China, as members to the government’s curriculum guideline review committee. From Alice Ou (區桂芝) to Tuan Hsin-yi (段心儀), Prudence Chou (周祝瑛) and Wu Wu-tien (吳武典), they not only have a strong pro-unification agenda, but also frequently glorify China and criticize Taiwan on Chinese official media, trying to distort Taiwan’s education reform. In spite of Taiwan’s diverse culture, they accuse the Democratic Progressive Party of carrying out “desinicization.”
I recently saw a video of three senior-high school students in New Taipei City holding a Chinese flag and calling President William Lai (賴清德) the “Taiwan Province governor.” They said they hope that Lai can “return Taiwan to the motherland by 2025.”
Take that video seriously. Why do young Taiwanese students recognize the People’s Republic of China as their “motherland?” It shows that Taiwan’s national identity, and culture and education about it should be deepened.
In the past few years, there have been cases of retired generals as well as military officers becoming accomplices in China’s “united front” efforts. Some have set up organizations under the command of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), looking for opportunities to infiltrate Taiwan.
As Beijing continues to dispatch warplanes and warships to intimidate Taiwan, and has not dropped the possibility of taking Taiwan by force, the CCP should be considered a hostile actor. Unfortunately, the ideological training of the military has blurred the distinction between us and the enemy, calling into question how the military is able to defend the nation.
As Thomas Paine, one of the US’ founders, once said: Independence and autonomy are common sense, and it is only natural not to leave the fate of one’s country in others’ hands. Culture is the link to life. Trade and technology make a country rich and strong, but culture and education make a country great.
Realizing Taiwan’s cultural and educational subjectivity and shaping a united nation are the cornerstones for consolidating democracy and protecting sovereignty.
Lee Chuan-hsin is chairman of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Eddy Chang
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
RSS