In 1624, Taiwan became embroiled in the Age of Sail competition between Dutch and Spanish colonial powers. During the rule of the Chinese Ming Dynasty loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功), also known as Koxinga, and the subsequent rule by the Manchu-led Qing Dynasty, Han Chinese culture was introduced to Taiwan. Later in the Japanese colonial rule, Japanese culture was also imported. Together, the historical traces of the past colonization, together with its inheritance of Austronesian culture, have enriched the cultural landscape of Taiwan.
With that diverse culture, Taiwan has become inclusive through respect and tolerance. The early democratic efforts by the Taiwan Cultural Association and the Petition Movement for the Establishment of a Taiwanese Parliament laid a foundation for freedom and democracy, eventually leading to a free and democratic Taiwan.
China has followed a different path, forming an authoritarian and dictatorial system through its national ideology and institutional structures. Taiwan’s ethnic minorities should not be misled by the efforts of collaborators in Beijing’s all-encompassing “united front” work to only recognize “Chinese culture,” which is an attempt to weaken Taiwan’s culture and identity.
Given its essential majority in the legislature, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers recently recommended seven academics, who are mostly pro-China, as members to the government’s curriculum guideline review committee. From Alice Ou (區桂芝) to Tuan Hsin-yi (段心儀), Prudence Chou (周祝瑛) and Wu Wu-tien (吳武典), they not only have a strong pro-unification agenda, but also frequently glorify China and criticize Taiwan on Chinese official media, trying to distort Taiwan’s education reform. In spite of Taiwan’s diverse culture, they accuse the Democratic Progressive Party of carrying out “desinicization.”
I recently saw a video of three senior-high school students in New Taipei City holding a Chinese flag and calling President William Lai (賴清德) the “Taiwan Province governor.” They said they hope that Lai can “return Taiwan to the motherland by 2025.”
Take that video seriously. Why do young Taiwanese students recognize the People’s Republic of China as their “motherland?” It shows that Taiwan’s national identity, and culture and education about it should be deepened.
In the past few years, there have been cases of retired generals as well as military officers becoming accomplices in China’s “united front” efforts. Some have set up organizations under the command of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), looking for opportunities to infiltrate Taiwan.
As Beijing continues to dispatch warplanes and warships to intimidate Taiwan, and has not dropped the possibility of taking Taiwan by force, the CCP should be considered a hostile actor. Unfortunately, the ideological training of the military has blurred the distinction between us and the enemy, calling into question how the military is able to defend the nation.
As Thomas Paine, one of the US’ founders, once said: Independence and autonomy are common sense, and it is only natural not to leave the fate of one’s country in others’ hands. Culture is the link to life. Trade and technology make a country rich and strong, but culture and education make a country great.
Realizing Taiwan’s cultural and educational subjectivity and shaping a united nation are the cornerstones for consolidating democracy and protecting sovereignty.
Lee Chuan-hsin is chairman of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS