In 1624, Taiwan became embroiled in the Age of Sail competition between Dutch and Spanish colonial powers. During the rule of the Chinese Ming Dynasty loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功), also known as Koxinga, and the subsequent rule by the Manchu-led Qing Dynasty, Han Chinese culture was introduced to Taiwan. Later in the Japanese colonial rule, Japanese culture was also imported. Together, the historical traces of the past colonization, together with its inheritance of Austronesian culture, have enriched the cultural landscape of Taiwan.
With that diverse culture, Taiwan has become inclusive through respect and tolerance. The early democratic efforts by the Taiwan Cultural Association and the Petition Movement for the Establishment of a Taiwanese Parliament laid a foundation for freedom and democracy, eventually leading to a free and democratic Taiwan.
China has followed a different path, forming an authoritarian and dictatorial system through its national ideology and institutional structures. Taiwan’s ethnic minorities should not be misled by the efforts of collaborators in Beijing’s all-encompassing “united front” work to only recognize “Chinese culture,” which is an attempt to weaken Taiwan’s culture and identity.
Given its essential majority in the legislature, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers recently recommended seven academics, who are mostly pro-China, as members to the government’s curriculum guideline review committee. From Alice Ou (區桂芝) to Tuan Hsin-yi (段心儀), Prudence Chou (周祝瑛) and Wu Wu-tien (吳武典), they not only have a strong pro-unification agenda, but also frequently glorify China and criticize Taiwan on Chinese official media, trying to distort Taiwan’s education reform. In spite of Taiwan’s diverse culture, they accuse the Democratic Progressive Party of carrying out “desinicization.”
I recently saw a video of three senior-high school students in New Taipei City holding a Chinese flag and calling President William Lai (賴清德) the “Taiwan Province governor.” They said they hope that Lai can “return Taiwan to the motherland by 2025.”
Take that video seriously. Why do young Taiwanese students recognize the People’s Republic of China as their “motherland?” It shows that Taiwan’s national identity, and culture and education about it should be deepened.
In the past few years, there have been cases of retired generals as well as military officers becoming accomplices in China’s “united front” efforts. Some have set up organizations under the command of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), looking for opportunities to infiltrate Taiwan.
As Beijing continues to dispatch warplanes and warships to intimidate Taiwan, and has not dropped the possibility of taking Taiwan by force, the CCP should be considered a hostile actor. Unfortunately, the ideological training of the military has blurred the distinction between us and the enemy, calling into question how the military is able to defend the nation.
As Thomas Paine, one of the US’ founders, once said: Independence and autonomy are common sense, and it is only natural not to leave the fate of one’s country in others’ hands. Culture is the link to life. Trade and technology make a country rich and strong, but culture and education make a country great.
Realizing Taiwan’s cultural and educational subjectivity and shaping a united nation are the cornerstones for consolidating democracy and protecting sovereignty.
Lee Chuan-hsin is chairman of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
Taiwan needs to step up efforts to protect its access to rare earths amid escalating geopolitical risks and global economic uncertainty, given that its export-oriented economy relies heavily on imports of the elements to produce electronics. Taiwan is not the only country facing pressure to secure stable access to rare earths — metallic elements used in artificial intelligence servers, smartphones, electric vehicles and military applications such as fighter jets — after China imposed an export licensing measure last year that threatened to cut off supplies. China is using its dominance in rare earths as a bargaining chip in its trade negotiatons