After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists.
The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India to safeguard national security and fight terrorist forces that cross borders to attack innocent civilians.”
Following the statement, Indian social media users expressed appreciation for Taiwan, calling for further deepening and strengthening of the relationship between Taipei and New Delhi.
Prominent author and scientist Anand Ranganathan on X expressed his thoughts on Taiwan’s statement. “China does not recognise Kashmir as part of India. China has usurped 38000 sq km of Kashmir. China supports Pakistan on Kashmir,” Ranganathan wrote.
“Despite this, India does not have diplomatic relations with Taiwan. India does not even recognise Taiwan as a country. Time has come to correct this,” he added.
Ranganathan’s statement had more than 530,000 views, 40,000 likes and more than 9,700 reposts. Some users urged the Indian government to recognize Taiwan.
As the ministry’s statement triggered an important discussion on Indian social media, it is important to analyze why Taiwan made that statement and what it implies for Taiwan-India relations.
First, Taiwan communicated to New Delhi that it is sensitive to India’s national security concerns. By doing so, it set a stage for reciprocation. In case of an event concerning Taiwan’s national security, it would want India to be sensitive to its concerns, too.
Second, Taiwan accepted that terrorism is a national security risk, and it is a country’s “legitimate” right to take “necessary actions” to “fight terrorist forces that cross borders to attack innocent civilians.”
That is particularly important, because Taiwan clearly stated that terrorist forces came from across the border. By saying so, Taipei stood valiantly against Pakistan’s and China’s narrative, and acknowledged that terrorism is backed from across the border.
Third, the persistent threat to Taiwan’s national security comes from across the Taiwan Strait from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Taiwan and India share the CCP threat — India faces threats from across its disputed borders with China. By saying that “MOFA will continue to pay close attention to developments between India and Pakistan and engage in joint efforts to ensure peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific,” Taiwan stated that India-Pakistan tensions is a problem of the Indo-Pacific region. By saying so it sought reciprocation on the issue of threat to its national security as an Indo-pacific paradigm.
Finally, by highlighting India as a “democratic partner,” Taipei communicated that its association with New Delhi is long term and is based on shared commitment to democracy which ideologically is opposed to Chinese communism. Through the statement, Taiwan asserted its political identity and sought sensitivity to its geopolitical concerns.
Venus Upadhayaya is a Ministry of Foreign Affairs Taiwan fellow from India.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
RSS