The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too.
Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this.
There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison to US capabilities. The J-10C is not a full stealth fighter like the F-22 or F-35, but it does have some features to make it less visible to radar. Still, the incident highlights the significant investments the Chinese Communist Party has made in the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force, and speaks to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) target for full military modernization by 2027.
Illustration: Yusha
The use of the J-10C in this regional conflict suggests that goal might be steadily progressing, despite ongoing high-profile graft issues. Several senior military officers have been removed from their posts, because of allegations they were involved in corruption.
For now, the US is still the world leader, with more military aircraft than Russia, China, India, South Korea and Japan combined, according to FlightGlobal’s 2025 World Air Forces report. However, much of the US’ inventory is beyond its prime, filled with decades-old fighters, bombers and tankers. Meanwhile, the PLA’s air force is growing quickly, although it remains far from rivaling the US in overall size.
However, it is catching up. Washington maintains an advantage in fifth-generation aircraft such as the F-22 and F-35, although Beijing is closing the gap there, too. It is reportedly manufacturing more than 100 fifth-generation J-20 fighters annually, and nearly tripling production of other aircraft types, such as the J-10C and J-16, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) said.
This is possible because of the PLA’s centralized, whole-of-government approach. Taken together, the manufacturing of major combat assets such as ships and planes shows a military and industrial base increasingly prepared for conflict with the US, CSIS adds.
China is also beginning to match the US when it comes to systems integration, Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies senior resident fellow for aerospace and China studies Mike Dahm said.
“The US military has excelled at linking different ground, space and airborne systems together in an effective kill chain,” he said. “I believe the Chinese have now demonstrated that in the India-Pakistan conflict.”
Geography matters, too, Dahm said. Beijing has the advantage of being in the same neighborhood as the potential wars it might fight. That is not the case for the US, even with its numerous bases in the Indo-Pacific region.
Beijing’s airpower capabilities have been ringing alarm bells in Washington. The latest Pentagon annual China Military Power Report points to a dramatic rise in the PLA’s nuclear, space, missile and aviation capabilities over the past few years.
China wants to expand its long-range reach beyond the first island chain, a virtual line drawn from the islands of Japan, passing the Philippines and curving at the southern end of the South China Sea between Malaysia and Vietnam, the report said. The chain is a key aspect of Washington’s security architecture in the Indo-Pacific region — but crucially, it also encompasses Taiwan, which Beijing claims as its own.
Xi has vowed that China would unify with the self-ruled nation by 2049 — it is a central part of his national rejuvenation plan. However, that timeline might change.
For the first time in its annual military drills earlier this year, the Ministry of National Defense cited 2027 as a potential year for a Chinese invasion. That would align with Xi’s goal of building a modern military by then. US officials have also echoed that view, citing China’s rapid build-up of warships, fighter jets and missile stockpiles since 2020.
Still, capability does not equal intent, but China’s expanding reach raises the stakes for Taiwan’s defense and the US’ military dominance in the region.
US Indo-Pacific Command Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo said the PLA demonstrated growing capabilities through persistent operations against Taiwan, which escalated by 300 percent last year.
Testifying before the US Congress last month, he also warned they were not merely exercises, but “dress rehearsals for forced unification.”
Taiwan is already reassessing its defense strategy, with purchases of Patriot PAC-3 and PAC-3 Missile Segment Enhancement systems, anti-aircraft missiles capable of intercepting threats. In theory, this would also allow it to detect advanced fighters at higher altitudes. Despite the ongoing gridlock in parliament over the defense budget, Taipei would be under increasing pressure to expand its military spending.
Washington should also keep investing in next-generation aircraft technology to stay ahead of Beijing, which is working on a so-called sixth-generation fighter jet of its own. Embracing allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific region would also help — a task made more difficult by the White House tone on defense and trade. The India-Pakistan clash was a taste of what China’s air force might now be capable of. Washington and Taipei should not wait until the next demonstration.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS