Our opponent is not a competitor, but an enemy. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is using the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) coalition to “control Taiwan by using Taiwan” to achieve its goal of unification.
The enemy has launched a battle of unrestricted warfare — a total war that leaves Taiwanese, who uphold the democratic ideal that sovereignty rests with the people, with nowhere to turn. It would be foolish of us to continue using a limited-war mindset to respond to their tactics.
Pretentiously touting “values” and “neutrality” only allows those with extremist ideas to take advantage of the situation, bringing disaster to the nation. The CCP, KMT and TPP are using an indirect democratic majority to contravene the public’s sovereign rights, undermining the self-determination of Taiwanese on their own land. How could human rights be traded under majority rule? Even if both sides were to agree, human rights are not market commodities to be bought and sold. If one fails to understand the meaning of freedom in democratic thought, pursuing justice on behalf of the public is out of the question.
Therefore, a mass recall movement is an appropriate solution. The KMT and TPP are no longer loyal opposition parties. Their representatives no longer serve as a bridge connecting society with the nation — rather, they would become the butchers of societal values and national survival.
Taiwan’s democratic constitutional system is being gradually consumed by our enemies, internal and external. Civil society must demonstrate the power of self-determination. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) cannot remain neutral on this matter — it is imperative that it establishes partnerships with civil groups.
Democratic social movements should awaken the consciousness of self-determination in each member of the public, even those who voted for the KMT or TPP. They should also aim to disseminate true and accurate information to the international community to ensure that allies around the world do not misjudge the situation. Taiwanese should not merely sit back and watch as our democratic system fails. We want to decide the fate of our own land.
Lai Rung-wei is an assistant professor and former manager of a financial company’s investment research office.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
“Can you tell me where the time and motivation will come from to get students to improve their English proficiency in four years of university?” The teacher’s question — not accusatory, just slightly exasperated — was directed at the panelists at the end of a recent conference on English language learning at Taiwanese universities. Perhaps thankfully for the professors on stage, her question was too big for the five minutes remaining. However, it hung over the venue like an ominous cloud on an otherwise sunny-skies day of research into English as a medium of instruction and the government’s Bilingual Nation 2030