Our opponent is not a competitor, but an enemy. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is using the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) coalition to “control Taiwan by using Taiwan” to achieve its goal of unification.
The enemy has launched a battle of unrestricted warfare — a total war that leaves Taiwanese, who uphold the democratic ideal that sovereignty rests with the people, with nowhere to turn. It would be foolish of us to continue using a limited-war mindset to respond to their tactics.
Pretentiously touting “values” and “neutrality” only allows those with extremist ideas to take advantage of the situation, bringing disaster to the nation. The CCP, KMT and TPP are using an indirect democratic majority to contravene the public’s sovereign rights, undermining the self-determination of Taiwanese on their own land. How could human rights be traded under majority rule? Even if both sides were to agree, human rights are not market commodities to be bought and sold. If one fails to understand the meaning of freedom in democratic thought, pursuing justice on behalf of the public is out of the question.
Therefore, a mass recall movement is an appropriate solution. The KMT and TPP are no longer loyal opposition parties. Their representatives no longer serve as a bridge connecting society with the nation — rather, they would become the butchers of societal values and national survival.
Taiwan’s democratic constitutional system is being gradually consumed by our enemies, internal and external. Civil society must demonstrate the power of self-determination. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) cannot remain neutral on this matter — it is imperative that it establishes partnerships with civil groups.
Democratic social movements should awaken the consciousness of self-determination in each member of the public, even those who voted for the KMT or TPP. They should also aim to disseminate true and accurate information to the international community to ensure that allies around the world do not misjudge the situation. Taiwanese should not merely sit back and watch as our democratic system fails. We want to decide the fate of our own land.
Lai Rung-wei is an assistant professor and former manager of a financial company’s investment research office.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
RSS