A spotlight in the UK has been shone on the Chinese Community Party’s (CCP) use of “united front” tactics to advance its political interests after reports that Yang Tengbo (楊騰波) — a resident of the UK for more than 20 years and an honorary member of the 48 Group Club, a UK-China friendship organization — had been involved with the CCP’s United Front Work Department.
It was reported last month that Yang, 50, was a close confidant of Britain’s Prince Andrew and had allegedly met two former British prime ministers. The story has drawn significant UK and international media attention for the way it seems to encapsulate the risks associated with maintaining open cultural and people-to-people exchanges with Chinese groups when the CCP so methodically targets them to advance its agenda, posing significant risks to civil society norms in liberal democracies.
The United Front Work Department was also in the news last month after a British Investigatory Powers Tribunal judgement ruled that MI5 — the UK’s domestic counterintelligence and security agency — had acted lawfully when in January 2022 it named Christine Lee, a British parliamentary lobbyist, as a threat to national security. Lee was found to have “knowingly engaged in political interference and activities” on behalf of the Chinese agency, arranging a donation of ￡584,177 (US$724,340) to then-British legislator Barry Gardiner and even receiving a reward from then-British prime minister Theresa May.
The challenge for liberal democracies is that it is difficult to discern sincere people-to-people exchanges from efforts directed by the CCP. There is no civil society in China to speak of, especially in the domain of international exchanges, with all organizations subsumed under the CCP. This has been turbocharged by Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) efforts to push “united front” work into a “new era.”
It is another example of how the CCP’s totalitarianism ultimately harms China, preventing Chinese from engaging with other nations on the basis of freedom and dignity. The CCP’s attempts at interference and manipulation do not bring China respect or admiration, only international backlash, which adversely affects Chinese, with restrictions on students, and academic and other exchanges having to be imposed to safeguard free societies.
The CCP preys on the openness and freedom of civil societies to manipulate public opinion, elections and people. As Mao Zedong (毛澤東) once said, the “united front” is the CCP’s “magic weapon” to undermine the West and advance the party’s interests.
However, it appears that many nations are waking up to these tactics. In the US, attention to the CCP’s actions has grown, such as the case of Linda Sun (孫雯), a former aide in the New York governor’s office who allegedly used her position to advance the CCP’s interests, including by blocking meetings between Taiwanese officials and state leaders, and removing references to Taiwan from state communications.
While Beijing’s “united front” operations have persisted for decades, democratic societies are growing more aware of its methods and less willing to tolerate such naked manipulation.
Eventually, the CCP oversteps the mark and its actions capture the public’s attention. This was seen with a YouTube documentary released by Pa Chiung (八炯) with Taiwanese rapper Chen Po-yuan (陳柏源) that showed how the CCP bribes Taiwanese influencers to make pro-China content.
In the UK, it was Yang’s connection to Prince Andrew that opened people’s eyes. As former British diplomat Charles Parton told the Unherd Web site, the prince has managed “to achieve since this row began five days ago what some of us have been urging for more than five years — getting a government to put threats from China at the top of the political agenda.”
It appears that the jig is up for the CCP.
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
RSS