Following the invitation of former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), a Chinese university tour group visited Taiwan on an exchange trip. Regarding Taiwan’s win at the World Baseball Softball Confederation’s Premier12, Song Siyao (宋思瑤), a female student from Fudan University, said the tour group “would like to congratulate China, Taipei team on their win. We wish mainland China and Taiwan compatriots can be like the team Chinatrust Brothers and work together for the motherland to take baseball to a higher level.”
Belittling Taiwan by referring to it as “China, Taipei” and attributing the accomplishment of our team as belonging to the “motherland” subtly conveys China’s decisive stance on “reunification.” Upon hearing such remarks, one cannot help but feel angry.
In October, two Chinese people caused disturbances at an event related to Hong Kong in Taipei’s Ximending (西門町) area. The severity of the Chinese university tour group’s actions are far worse. It is baffling that the government has taken no action in response.
I support cross-strait exchanges and agree with Tsinghua University Chinese Communist Party committee secretary Qiu Yong’s (邱勇) words that “the youth represent hope and are the architects of the future.”
I also hope that “young people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait will have more opportunities to get to know each other and build meaningful relationships.”
However, a guest should exhibit basic courtesy to their host — one cannot stand on Taiwanese soil and spread China’s “reunification” rhetoric.
If the situation were reversed, and Taiwanese were to openly advocate for Taiwanese independence while in China, what would happen to them?
Some might say that the difference between Taiwan and China lies in respect for the individual and freedom of speech. In Taiwan, everyone has the right to express their views freely. Today, if it were Taiwanese that were openly promoting “reunification” in Taiwan, presenting the view as their own, with talk of becoming one big “family,” their right to an opinion should naturally be respected.
However, when a Chinese student tour group visits Taiwan for an exchange, they should comply with Taiwan’s policies, uphold reciprocity and dignity, and follow legal norms. The remarks made by the tour group do not fall within the scope of free speech — rather, they are an encroachment of China’s “reunification” agenda. It was an attempt to use subtle language to convey China’s domineering message of “reunification” and deliberately diminish Taiwan’s identity as a nation. It is entirely inappropriate.
The Mainland Affairs Council has reiterated that, “Mainland Chinese individuals must not engage in conduct that undermines our sovereignty, downgrades Taiwan, or violates our laws and regulations. Violators will be dealt with in accordance with law,” and that “the people of Taiwan are warm and hospitable, but we do not welcome disrespectful troublemakers.”
Article 12 of the Regulations on Permission for Entrance of People of the Mainland Area Into the Taiwan Area (大陸地區人民進入臺灣地區許可辦法) stipulates that Chinese entering Taiwan for professional exchanges who contravene the principles of reciprocity and dignity would have their permits revoked or canceled, and their entry or exit permits may be voided.
The words of the tour group’s representative, Song, clearly contravene the principles of reciprocity and dignity, and constitute the improper spread of Chinese “reunification” rhetoric. According to the regulations, Song’s remarks were an illegal act. Thus, the government should take effective measures.
Chiang Huang-chih is a professor of law at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS