The collaboration between Indonesia and Taiwan has persisted for a long time, yielding numerous benefits for both parties. Taiwan is a strategic ally that offers advantageous prospects for Indonesia.
The collaboration between the two countries is founded on strategic values that extend beyond pragmatic political concerns. The cooperative framework established by Taiwan and Indonesia emphasizes strategic values that enhance their respective national positions and existence. Indonesia has consistently regarded other nations, particularly Taiwan, as allies. That notion is a fundamental aspect of Indonesia’s international relations, which is consistently stressed by Indonesian presidents, from Sukarno to Joko Widodo and now Prabowo Subianto.
Prabowo has substantial experience and expertise in international politics. His international political principles are distinctly reflected in his political speeches, narratives, arguments, attitudes and actions, indicating that he regards other nations as strategic partners in advocating for nationalism, justice and humanity in pursuit of global peace, as outlined in the constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
What would the future relationship be between Taiwan and Indonesia? Based on Prabowo’s foreign political practices, it is evident that the two nations’ connection would strengthen. Taiwan is given opportunities and access in Indonesia to cultivate connections across all sectors, particularly in education.
Taiwan has educational initiatives in Indonesia, such as the Ministry of Education Scholarship, Huayu Enrichment Scholarship and the International Industrial Talents Education Special Program. Meanwhile, Indonesians have a significant interest in pursuing their education in Taiwan, as evidenced by the annual increase in the number of Indonesian students: 5,074 in 2016, a sharp rise to 13,804 in 2020, followed by 16,639 in 2022 and 16,725 last year.
The economic and trade sectors also show a robust cooperative partnership between Taiwan and Indonesia. Taiwan is a significant strategic investor in Indonesia, with cumulative investments amounting to US$15.3 billion and generating about 1 million jobs. That investment was not a sudden, isolated action; it was a protracted process characterized by communication and positive relations that culminated in a mutually advantageous agreement between the two parties from a political economy perspective.
That data illustrate Taiwan’s effective diplomacy in Indonesia and indicate that the relationship between the two is strengthening, suggesting a future of even more robust relations. Prabowo is often perceived as regarding Taiwan as part of “one China,” indicating that he does not politically acknowledge Taiwan as a sovereign nation. However, this does not imply that he disregards Taiwan’s status as a strategic partner for Indonesia. The collaboration between the two nations demonstrates a positive connection that creates the potential to enhance their status as global powers, which would undoubtedly impact international politics favorably.
The Indonesian government provides Taiwan with access and chances to engage in activities across different vital sectors, potentially bolstering its presence in Indonesia. Many Indonesians hold bachelor’s, master’s and doctoral degrees from Taiwanese universities, directly and indirectly enhancing the nation’s stature and recognition in international politics. Taiwan has also executed investments that favorably influence the interests of both countries. This indicates that the prospects for collaboration between Taiwan and Indonesia would become more robust and enduring.
Salahudin is a political analyst and director of the Bureau of Research, Service, and Cooperation at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang in Indonesia.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS