Public health is one of Taiwan’s greatest strengths. Its National Health Insurance was already one of the best single-payer systems in the world, ensuring that everyone has coverage while staying nimble in the face of financial challenges.
The COVID-19 pandemic was a chance for the world to see Taiwan’s full public health apparatus at work. Officials caught wind of a strange virus circulating in China and jumped to screen and then stem the flow of travelers before the word “coronavirus” even made headlines. It was one of the only countries in the world to escape widespread transmission before vaccines were distributed, becoming a case study for virologists everywhere. It did all this despite being barred from the WHO, lending weight to its appeals for inclusion.
Yet for all of its triumphs, there remain some frustrating blind spots in Taiwan’s public health system. One of the biggest is coverage of sexually transmitted infections (STIs).
According to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) data from last year, STI rates have been steadily rising. Gonorrhea diagnoses rose from 7,082 in 2020 to 8,015 in 2022, while syphilis cases increased from 8,800 in 2021 to 9,631 over the same period. Most were among people younger than 35, with the CDC warning at the time that more than 90 percent of young people are being exposed to STIs due to unsafe sexual practices.
Although cases are rising, most STI testing is paid out of pocket. At Po Jen General Hospital in Taipei, publicly available pricing shows it costs NT$3,000 for a “basic” suite of eight STI tests. A full suite of 11 tests costs NT$5,000. Due to the price, most doctors recommend only testing for common STIs and only paying for others if symptoms are present.
From a public health perspective, this is asking for trouble. The high prices discourage people from getting tested, meaning more people will spread diseases unknowingly. As health authorities know that most young people are engaging in unsafe sexual practices, it is irresponsible to rely on social stigma to stem the spread of disease. Concrete action must be taken.
HIV is an instructive case study. Tests are widely available for free through clinics and non-governmental organizations, while at-home test kits cost NT$200. By the end of last year, new diagnoses had dropped to a 20-year low.
At the same time, access to preventive treatment leaves much to be desired. People at risk of contracting HIV are encouraged to take pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) regularly. In other countries the price can be negligible with generics, but in Taiwan, only the brand-name Truvada is available, costing an average of NT$12,000 per month. Although some hospitals offer patient assistance programs to help with the cost of PrEP, they are not available to non-citizens, who must order online from questionable sources.
One of the fundamentals of public health is to prevent the spread of disease. To do that, officials must do their utmost to make sure that everyone who might be at risk has easy access to testing and preventive measures, paired with comprehensive education.
Yet for all of its adherence to best practices in other fields, many parts of Taiwan’s health system remain antiquated when it comes to sexual health, preferring instead to slough off the burden of prevention to abstinence education and public shame. Sexual health is no less a part of a person’s well-being than other kinds. Breaking through the social stigma is the only way to truly protect ourselves and others.
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
RSS